All forums
Groups
All
Feedback
Bugs/Features
Seek opinion on a case
Court Judgments
Central Laws
State Laws
Regulatory Announcements
Anonymous User
Username

Password

Sign up
under private complaint and i.d. act
Started by Anonymous User at 7:07 p.m. on 18 March 10
espected sir/madam,
                    i was working i a pvt. ltd. company from 25-03-2008 to 08-08-2009. on 08-08-2009 they terminated my services without any compensation, chargesheet,notice. while my overtime,bonus and other d.a.'s were pnding to the company and i already have sent them a notice on 21-07-2009. after that company get annoyed to me and terminate my services and also did not give me any termination letter. so i filed a case under sec. 2(a) i.d. act 1947. in concilation proceedings on the date for compromise they did not come, so the case from there sent to labour court bhatinda by indicating ex-party. during concilation the owner make a call to me and started threatening me and told me to take my case back otherwise he will file several false cases against me as he has a lot of money and power. against this i send a letter to s.s.p ferozepur and he marked the copy for further action to the police chowki of my village. but after this the constable got money from other pary and did not do take any action. after this i sent letter to d.g.p. chandigarh and c.m. of punjab but nothing happened and my owner regularly started to threaten me. after this on 13-12-2009 he came along with his partner and 3-4 men along with them to my house and tried to kidnap me and also slapped me and blew punches. my neighvbours came and they helped and saved me. now i am very afraid as police is also not helping me and the owner of company has allresady shot a employee dead ealrlier. what should i do now?
Citations
Started by sd.mansur at 1:18 a.m. on 18 March 10
An employee of Govt. of West Bengal retired from service and after retirement deduction was made from terminal benefits.
Whether the pension will be fixed at the re-fixed pay or in terms of the last pay actually drawn by the petitioner/employee while he was in service
Where we can get the notifications of amended Cr.P.C which were came into force W.E.F 31.12.2009
Started by Anonymous User at 11:12 p.m. on 17 March 10
The central Govt.already gave notification carriying out certain amendments to the Cr.P.C w.e.f 31.12.2009. But so far we did not see the notification. Where can we get such notificatation. 
Can a Magistrate of First Class direct the to police to take additional evidence U/sec.173(8) Cr.P.C
Started by Anonymous User at 11:07 p.m. on 17 March 10
In one case, the accused filed a petition U/sec.173(8) Cr.P.C seeking the Magistrate to direct the police to receive the suicide note of the deceased, which is in terms which is favavourable to the accused. When the court asked why they did not give the same to police, the accused replied that if they give directly the police will spoil the evidence as such prayed the court to take to direct police to take the same and file additional charge sheet. Notable point is in this case charge sheet already filed by prosecuition. Now my question is whether magistrate of first class has power to direct the police to receive the said suicide letter and file addtional chargesheet.  
transfer
Started by ganu1967 at 7:38 p.m. on 17 March 10
i was poasted at a branch of lic 100 kms from headquarters in clerical cadre from 13.03.2006 to 31.10.2006. on selection to class II cadre through all india competition i was posted at another branch 110 kms from headqauters from 01.11.2006 to 30.04.2008. due to nonfulfillment of business target i was reverted back to clerical cadre and posted at previous branch from 01.05.2008 and seniority, increments of clerical cadre was restored with retrospective effect. transfer of employees to headquarters takes place on seniority basis every year but i was not transferred as my seniority was taken from 01.05.2008 only but my contention is that my seniority should be taken from 13.09.2007 after deduction of 18 months of my absence from the first branch. what is your legal opinion? wheather i shall get any relief from courts?
uploading of court decision after 2009
Started by sunil kumar gupta at 10:22 p.m. on 16 March 10
Mowadays updation of judgement is not taking place.You are doing a very noble work for this poor country.Kindly continue
Best of luck
SK Gupta 
To get the ownership & possession of residential flat
Started by Anonymous User at 11:40 a.m. on 16 March 10
After the demise of my father in year 2000, my elder brother tactfully got the residential flat which was in my father’s name ( self acquired & lying  vacant) got transferred  in his name in 2002 via some kind of a nomination papers allegedly done by my brother (forged) in my absence while I was touring.. A case was registered on him by me for IPC 420/467 and he was in the lock up for almost 3 weeks. 
My brother kept denying me my right of 50% share, saying he is now the full owner of the flat and also have captured the flat in full and was not allowing me any access at all. We were not in talking terms at all. 
Subsequently my brother is no more ( died in 2009 ) and the case has now been aborted. Now his wife aged 50 years and son aged 20 years are singing the same tune and trying to capture the property. I tried my level best to agree to have a mutual agreement but of no use.
What remedy & process I need to do, to get back my rights over the flat and the possession.
 1)  How will I claim my share of flat & possession / value of flat at market rate ( currently at Rs. 36 lacs situated at Malad west )
2 ) In which court do I need to file the suit & the nature of suit. How much court fee I need to pay & process
3) Do I need to file a criminal case against my brother’s family for cheating / fraud / breach of trust etc 
4) Do I need to put a case on the society also for not following a fair & better process of not informing all the legal heirs and executing due care before transferring the flat in my brother’s name. 
•	For cheating / malpractices
•	Cancellation of share certificate issued to my brother  / Restiriction
•	Who is the Current member as per the Members Register / records 
•	My name to be incorporated as claimant on the flat register
•	Restrain order for any commercial transaction of what so ever nature
•	Non action till date from the date of Last AGM 13.08.2005 for deleting the name of my brother from the records.
5) How will get my name registered / acknowledged in the society records and restrain order on the society
Can a person sell others property by geeting his name on municipal records ?
Started by deepika at 11:40 p.m. on 15 March 10
if a person has handed his property in sum body else custody for 4 years and had no news form the owner, then can he by getting himself on the municipal records sell that property legally?

what would be the consequences on the person who buys the property consequently if the owner comes thereafter and claims his right over the property?
M/s Bikanervala v. M/s Aggarwal Bikanerwala
Started by Anonymous User at 4:14 p.m. on 14 March 10
If a party using the deceptively similar name only for a single shop and not spreading its business by use of that particular name then also that party could be stopped from using the tradename of other company. This is given in M/s Bikanervala v. M/s Aggarwal Bikanerwala[2] where the respondent was running a sweet shop in with the name of AGGARWAL BIKANERVALA and the plaintiff was using the name BIKANERVALA from 1981 and also got registered it in the year 1992. hence they applied for permanent injunction over the use of the name AGGARWAL BIKANERWALA for the sweet shop by the defendant. Court held in favour of the plaintiff and stopped defendant from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly dealing in food articles for human consumption under the impugned trade mark/trade name/infringing artistic label 'AGGARWAL BIKANER WALA' or from using any trade mark/trade name/infringing artistic work containing the name/mark 'BIKANER WALA/BIKANERVALA' or any other name/mark/artistic work which is identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trademark 'BIKANERVALA'.

M.O.F.A.
Started by Anonymous User at 8:44 a.m. on 14 March 10
ALL JUDGMENTS BY JUSTICE VAJIFDAR 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next