my daughterinlaw file a fir against his husband and his parents alongwith me and my wife in oct. 1999 U/S 498a and 406 case is still under trial in the family court even the statment is not yet comleted by my daughterinlaw 
I want to know
1. Can I proceed my case to fast track court if yes what is the proceedure and at what cost I am now a cinior citizen retired in 2007 my age is now of 62 years

2.I have got my new passport after noc from court on 31/3/2009 valid upto 30/03/2010 

3.I have to renew it would I have again seek NOC from the court 

4.there was no time limit was mentioned in NOC issued by the court
  Seeking response from the leggle expert or experence friends

sbkundu 

 

 

A long time ago, I had a copy of A judgment by Hon'ble Monjula Bose, Calcutta High Court 

namely : in the matter of Joseph Martin ...

I have dopne a search through your site and could not find it, though, I know through personal knowledge that it exists.

Will you kindly update this and include this important judgement ?

Congratulations on a very good site.

I remeber reading a judgementgiven in Maharashtra about 6 to 8 months ago where the court did not accept an estranged wife's claim to a house that was registered in her name. The husband contended that though the property was registered in her name it was he who financed it entirely and could prove it. The court accepted the argument and ruled that wife could not claim the property as her own totally. 

I am looking for the judgement and other details. Can anyone help with some information on the subject?

my name is john paul and i am respondent no 2 in the reported judgement passed by hon'ble bombay high court bench at aurangabad on 25/02/2010 posted by yourself namely sahednnisa d/o bakruddin v/s state of maharshtra. i had appeared in the said case as party in person and studied the whole case by surfing your website and i succeeded in the said case therefore i am very thankfull to you

hi i would like to report a judgment which is not complete 
its initial paragraphs 1 to 24 are not there and it starts from para 25 of the judgment


G. Amsaveni, G. Dhanraj And V. ... vs P. Kanakaraj on 15 March, 2007 http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1410140/

Please correct the document and provide full context

I have been working in a company since 2nd June 2007, the earlier promotion rule was 3 yrs as on cut off date i.e 30 june for person who were having Post qulaification exp of 1 Year and for Trainee it was 1 YR FOR TRAINEE period and 3 year on regular period.Now suddenly , Mgmt has changed the policy and took one year trainee period as regular service .Thus officer with Post qualification exp is suffering.When management realised that Trainee period should not be considered as regular service than what they are going to do is changing the promotion and bringing 2 Yrs Criteria for employee with POST qualification exp and 3 Yrs For trainee.I wantd to know what would be the status of the person who has not been given promotion as it is being told that it will be effected from the date of change of the policy.

sivagama sundary at 8:06 p.m. on 28 Feb. 10 
whether postmortem report is a pre requisite to award compensation under m.v.act. the deceased sustained grivieous injury at irignzhakuda, in kerela. F.I.R. filled at irignzhakuda police station. but he died after two years from the date of accident, due to the consequences of the accident at pattukkottai, tamilnadu. but postmortem  could not be conducted because of lack of communication between pattukkottai police station and irignzhakuda police station. only supportive evidence are medical reports and evidence of docter who gave treatment to him. whether  he entitled to compensation under m.v.act? is there any case law to that effect?

whether postmortem report is a pre requisite to award compensation under m.v.act. the deceased sustained grivieous injury at irignzhakuda, in kerela. F.I.R. filled at irignzhakuda police station. but he died after two years from the date of accident, due to the consequences of the accident at pattukkottai, tamilnadu. but postmortem  could not be conducted because of lack of communication between pattukkottai police station and irignzhakuda police station. only supportive evidence are medical reports and evidence of docter who gave treatment to him. whether  he entitled to compensation under m.v.act? is there any case law to that effect?

i,mywife n 2 sons r accused in a case of 498a,406.
my younger son was not in india at the time of marig of my elder son n the comlananat.aftr tht wn my ynngr son came india, complanant was not in india i.e.at no point of time comlanant n my yngr son were in india. even then police got registerd fir u/s 498a n 406 agnst v 4 incld my yngr son. now the case is at stage of charges  agnst me n my wife n my both sons r kept in khana # 2 as they r out of india. court has  started the process of p.o.agnst them.
how the process of p.o.can b stopped/delayed?
plz help n guide

Dear Sirs
A,B,C &D (4) persons guaranteed a CC limit against hypothication for 9.90 lacs in 1989.
D withdrew immediately within 10 months of signing the guarantee from company.

Bank then enhanced the limt to 18 lacs in 1992 with guarantee from A,B,C of the old and a new guarantor E. Admittedly D did not sign this .

Company went NPA shortly and Bank took hypothicated goods worth 12 lacs in possetion & filed suit against all GuarantorsA,B,C,D &E (5) guarantors for Rs 22 lacs with interest.Defendents included D ,the one who signed for 9.90 lacs.

Court held that D is responsible upto 9.90 lacs only.
12 lacs value of goods in possession of bank be appropriated for all the defenders and decree for 10 lacs (the balance) was passed against all (5)A,B,C,D & E saying that Balance after Set off is equal to the sum guranteed by D also

Sir, My question is whether any case law or Citation can support my thinking that while appropriating 12 Lacs,court should have satisfied the first limit of 9.90 lacs & then the balance against Enhanced limit. and D should have been deemed to have satisfied his Guarantee of 9.90 lacs.

1 Can D apply under Sec 152 CPC for correction of this Omission
2Pl. provide some Case Laws /Citations & suggest How D should proceed as he can not go in appeal to DRAT for his inabilty to make a deposit.

Thanks & best Regards
Suresh