Hello,

I am a 52 year old housewife. I have realized after many years of marriage that my husband is a conman who has earned his livelihood through dubious and shady dealings on the wrong side of the law. He is/has been embroiled in many court cases over the last 30 years - which he has kept completely secret from me. He also uses several names - slight variations on his spelling. Now he has filed several frivolous and fictitious cases against me also. Is there some way that I can find out all the cases this man has ever been involved in? I found at least one over here on Indian kanoon - and wondered if there is a database of all cases in India that one can browse through and get information from.

This would greatly help my cause and help me know the real personality of the man who I unfortunately married.

Tortured wife

can anyone provide me with judgement copy Sumida Interenational Vs.Rama Vision , 2007(4) Criminal court cases 494 Delhi).
Directors signing the cheque but resigning  before the  cheques presented can not be absolved of their responsibilites.

C. R. R. No.54 of 2009
Judgment on December7, 2009

F. A. No.197 of 1995
Judgment on 17.11.2009

The Dept. of Higher and Tech. Education , Maharashtra has recently issued some vague and baseless rules that the students seeking higher education like engineering / architect / pharmacy / hote management should have been born in Maharashtra or produce domicile certificate of " permanent resident" . To add the fuel, The Minister of Education went to media and gave confirmation to another controversy that candidate and his or her father should also have been born in maharashtra else they would not be eligible for applying under maharasthra state candidates. It is funny that, our bureaucrats and ministers are unaware that no domicile rule is yet made by the govt. under which a domicile of "permanent residence" can be issued nor top officers are unable to understand under which rule or provision they are empowered to issue this certificate and till date on what basis the domicile certificates were being issued. If anyone asks an IAS officer of this State under which act he has been empowered  to issue such certificate, he can not reply (normally any certificate or certificate of action or proceedings if initiated by a Govt. officer, he has to mention in the document under what purview he has been issuing the said document).  Let us forget about the rule or provision; consider the following -

Article 15(1) of Constitution of India prohibits the State from discriminating against any citizen on the ground of place of birth, amongst other grounds.  Exceptions carved out in Article 15 (3) to (5) to the prohibition of discrimination enable the State for making any special provision for women, children or for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens, however  none of the exceptions permit the state for  making any classification or discrimination on the ground of place of birth.

The criterion of Domicile Certificate “By Birth”  is per se violative of Article 15 (1) of Constitution of India  as it makes discrimination or classification on the ground of place of birth and the criterion for “Permanent Residence” is vague and arbitrary and also  akin to criterion of “Domicile by Birth”.  Tthe Hon’ble Apex Court in Dr. Pradeep Jain V/s. Union of India and others reported in AIR 1984 SC 1420  had specifically held that the concept of domicile is applicable for the nation and not for any particular State or geographical area within the nation.  The Hon’ble Apex Court, though approved requirement of residence for admission to college in a State as eligibility criterion, had specifically held that, Article 15 (1) prohibits discrimination on the ground of place of birth.  The Hon’ble Apex Court in subsequent judgements  upheld the validity of requirement of residence as one of the criteria for admission in  Colleges in different States, though in none of the judgements  the domicile by birth was upheld.

 

The entire effort government in prescribing domicile by birth appears to be  so called giving an opportunity or preference to the “sons of soil”. This policy of giving preference to the sons of soil is contrary to and violative of the Preamble of Constitution of India as well which resolves to secure to all its Citizens, fraternity, assuring the dignity of the individual and the “unity and integrity” of the nation.  The Hon’ble Apex Court in the judgement of Dr. Pradeep Jain had cautioned in following words:-    

“…the concept of domicile if used for the purpose other than its legitimate purpose  may give rise to lethal radiations which may in the long run tend to break up the unity and integrity of the country.  We would, therefore, strongly urge upon the State Governments to exercise this wrong use of expression “domicile” from the rules regulating the admissions to their educational institutions and particularly Medical Colleges and to desist from introducing  and maintaining  domiciliary requirement as a condition of eligibility for such admissions .."

 

The denial of admission in absence of such certificate is  also violative of Article 19(1)(e) of Constitution of India which confers a fundamental right on the citizens of India to freely move and reside in any part of India.

 

In this era of government's thrust in spending cores of rupees in so called boosting education as a right of every citizen, this government's decision of implementing such senseless needs to be protested with nail and tooth.

 

Raju George

9921373030

I appeared in Engineering Services Examination in the year 2000. Was allotted and appointed to MES initially in the year 2002.After 8 years I came to know under RTI,that i had been re-allotted to CES (Central Engineering Service) but due to non-receipt of re-allotemnet letter issued by the Railway Minitrsy,my dossiers were never forwarded by the Ministry of Defence to the CPWD.as a result of which i had not been appointed to a service duly allotted to me as per my Merit and prefernces.How can i get appointed to CES protecting my pay and seniority?
Will the Courts alow me the benefits of appointment from previuos date.
Am I entitled to compensation on account of non-appointmnet to a service duly allotted to me as per my merit and preferences.

Sir/Madam,
While i appreciate your effort to bring the law and its interpretation to public, i request you to be sensitive to the individuals names quoted in the documents. this is atrocious. You can not just like that publish it, just because it became a verdict. It is more than law, more than interpretation. it is name of a person. You need to be human to understand it. kindly send me the mail id of the person incharge of Kanoon, i would like some of the names removed or some names to be replaced with a proxy one. Using the names as they are, spoils the name of persons. if you can tell me whom to contact, i can follow it. already someone has made this point very clear. Google search links the person, so a lot of people are misusing this information. I would like to suggest that in stead of using the full name,  you use the first two alphabets in a name to of a person in the documents.
can i believe that actions would be taken with immediate effect?

Sir,
Please provide me judgements pertaining to amendment of plaint (In my case permission to amend the plaiont is sought due to high handed act on the part of the defendants in having raised some construction during pendency of the litigation, whereas there is no question of any malafied or inaction on the part of the plaintiffs in seeking the amendment. Even the defendants were restrained to raise any cosntruction over the disputed land.
Sir,
Please provide me the latest judgement allowing the amendment under order 6 rule 17 of CPC.  

live-in-relationship is also presumable as a marriage

The items (car accessories and credit cards) missing from my car during our family visit to the Innovative film city, Bidadi (Karnataka)on 6th March 2010.  After taking the parking ticket, we parked our car in the secured parking lot of the film city at about 12:00 PM, and went inside, and at around 5:30 pm we got the SMS intimation from Citibank that a transaction of Rs. 10,093 has occurred on my wife’s credit card. We immediately informed the bank to block the cards, and reached to the car in parking lot. We found that the following items were missing from the car:

1.	2 credit cards (Citibank) – Transactions of about Rs. 30000 have already occurred on both these cards, by the time we got the SMS intimation for one of the ending transactions. 
2.	1 Debit card (Citibank)
3.	1 LCD screen – Valued Rs.  4000
4.	1 Music System (Sony) – Valued Rs. 6000
5.	Other important documents – Driving License and Pan card

We immediately reported about this to the film city’s security staff and after a long argument they finally acknowledged our complaint written to their MD.

We went to the local police station to lodge the complaint against this theft, but we were asked to meet the Film city people next morning and settle the matter. However, as suggested by the police station in-charge, when we went to meet the Film city people on 7th March 2010, they refused to acknowledge and take any responsibility for the incident. 
We again went back to the police station and tried lodging the complaint, but since then, even after traveling 4-5 times from about 60 Km distance, we are not able to get it done. The in-charge was not available everytime we visited the police station, and as per the information from the police station staff, the complaint can be registered only in the presence of the police station in-charge.

Please suggest, what should I do as I'm lost in the web of this helpless system.