PARTITION BY WICH PARTITION IS ACKNOWLEDGED IT IS NOT METES AND BOUND NO REGISTRATION OF DOCUMENT IS NECESSORY.

Can Finance Secretary Chandigarh as secretary Agriculture Have power to cancel the auction platforms alloted by Allotment committee included SDM as joint secretary state agricultural marketting board,Chairman market committee chandigarh,independant director appointed by chandigarh administration

kindly provide citations of SC & Mumbai HC preferably, wherein the appeal for setting aside an ex parte nullity of marriage, by the respondent was dismissed on the grounds - 
1. the respondent has received the nullity petition & family court has proof of signed RPAD, despite which the respondent has never appeared in the family court...nor anyone has appeared on behalf of the respondent, also family counsellor's letter was received by the respondent, however never attented the family court ....& hence ex-parte order was granted.

2. delay condonation application & petition for setting aside the ex-parte order is put after 6 months of the order, by the respondent...

3. the petitioner has contracted a second marriage, after waiting for the statutory period of 90 days.......

awaiting
LH

supreme court judgement for directors liability recent.director resigning after issuing post dated cheque.

I need to know any authority on the following facts.........
That that husband has been directed to pay maintanance to her wife and revision hasbeen filed against the said order.
The point i would like to know is that one witness was examined in defence of husband's case and his examination in chief was recorded but the cross was deferred as court timewas over.On next date the presiding officer was on leave and on next date an application was moved for adjournment as the said witness was not present but the said application was rejected and the court passed the order and as such the testimony of this witness was left out of consideration.
The point i would i like to know whether the matter can be remanded by the sessions court to lower court in these set of circumstances and is there any authority in this regard.

Whether the employee shall be terminated with effect from date of suspension or date of approval 

1.Accused issues post dated cheques as managing director.
2.Before the due date he transfer the holding shares to other party and resigns.However consideration for sale as per their agreement not recived by him.
3.After transfer of management he resigns before the due date.
4.Form 32 filed with authorities.On due date cheqe bounces due insufficient funds and signature withdrawn.
5.is he liable! crime starts on the day cheque issued!

(iii) Clubbing of other cognizable offences would not be permissible to evade the provisions of section 195 of the Code; Barappa v State of Karnataka, (1997) 2 Crimes 575 (Kant) 


(iii) Section 340 Cr P prescribed the procedure as to how a complaint may be preferred under section 195 Cr P while under section 195 Cr P it is open to the Court before which the offence was committed to prefer a complaint for the prosecution of the offender Provisions under section 195 Cr P are mandatory and no Court can take COGNIZANCE of offences referred to therein; MS Ahlawat v State of Haryana, AIR 2000 SC 168: 2000 Cr LJ 388 (SC) 

An order of DISMISSAL under section 203 of the Code is no bar to the entertainment of a SECOND COMPLAINT on the same facts but it will be entertained only in exceptional circumstances; Mohinder Singh v State (Chandigarh Admn), (1997) 3 Crimes 142 (P&H) 

(i) A summoning order passed by Magistrate under section 204 of the Code cannot necessarily be treated to be an interlocutory order thereby completely barring a revision against the same in view of the bar under section 397 (2) of the Code The test to examine whether such an order is an interlocutory order or not is that if the decision against such an order finally terminates the criminal proceedings, it would not be treated as an interlocutory order On the other hand if decision given either way would still allow the proceedings to go on then the order would not be a final order but an interlocutory order and then a revision against such an order would be barred under section 397(2) of the Code; Umakant Panday v A JM, (1997) 2 Crimes 27 (All) 

(ii) Even after issue of process in summons case the accused can plead of ABSENCE of any triable case against him and the Magistrate, on being satisfied on reconsideration of the complaint, has DISCRETIONary power to order, dropping of the proceedings against the accused; Awadhesh Prasad Singh alias Awadhesh Prasad Sharma v State of Bihar, (1997) 3 Crimes 70 (Pat) 

(iii) Accused are responsible for the conduct of business the necessary requirement issue process against the company is fulfilled Rejection of recalling of process issued against petitioner is PROPER; Orient Syntex Ltd v Besant Capital Tech Ltd, 2000 Cr LJ 210 (Bom) 


Filing of complaint case and FIR lodged simultaneously Magistrate empowered to stay complaint call for report on POLICE officer and tried together was PROPER; Birendra Kumar v State of Bihar, 2000 Cr LJ 145 (Pat) 

(i) Where there is a communality of purpose or design when there is continuity of action then all those persons involved can be accused of the same or different offences committed in course of same transaction If such two diametrically opposite versions are put to joint trial the confusion which can cause in the trial could be incalcullable Permission to joint trial illegal; Balbir v State of Haryana, AIR 2000 SC 11: 2000 Cr LJ 169 (SC) 

(ii) The two trials were separately conducted one after the other by the same Court before the same judge and judgment in both cases were separately pronounced on the same day No doubt the session judge should take care of that he would confine his judgment in one case only to the evidence adduced in the case The public prosecutor who prosecuted one case should avoid prosecution in other case Permission for joint trial not legal; Balbir v State of Haryana, AIR 2000 SC 11: 2000 Cr LJ 169 (SC) 

Pl. give citations Regarding Section 78 (1) ;78(1)(b);73(FF)after 2007 

P&H Highcourt or Hon. Supreme Court's judgements which support -
Punjab agricultural produce marketing act 1961
Punjab agricultural produce marketing Rules 1962