Air 1970 Orissa  page 198 is  missing 
it a  decision  of  Orissa HC  on  section  44  of the Transfer  of  Property  Act 

Dear Sir,

Kindly provide me with judgements of preferrably Gujarat HC or Hon. Supreme Court which support - 
1. PWDVA Act 2005 is not applicable if filed after the Hon. Family Court has granted NULLITY of MARRIAGE under sec.12(1)(a) of HMA or filing of DV by the wife after annulment of hindu marriage, as per hindu marriage act, is not sustainable, also is considered vexatious.....

2. CrPC 202 issued for an extortion case IPC 383 n 384, police submit enquiry n report saying no cognisable offence made out. Kindly provide judgements esp. of the Hon. SC & Mumbai HC which state irrespective of police report, the magistrate can issue process under CrPC 204 & shud not dismiss the complaint under CrPC 203. The complaint was filed with extortion charge i.e. Sec. 383, 384,since, money is demanded with threats of implicating in criminal cases, if demands not met & further a false criminal case of 498a is lodged, thus injury to repute, soul n mind is made by the accused, police when interrogated the accused he has given justification for the money demand as some kind of settlement amount & police gives b-report on the ground that it is all family matter, hence no case made out....the evidence filed by the complainant is the audio record of the call wherein money demand has been made without any word like settlement and all rough tone only, it is the police who feels that money demand is not unjust, however, it is actually a matter of trial, so process shud be issued, is what complainant feels....thus some citation which will relate above situation (CrPC 202, IPC 383, 384), etc...

awaiting at ur very earliest,
high regards
thank U

Dear Sir,

Kindly provide me with judgements of preferrably Gujarat HC or Hon. Supreme Court which support - 
1. PWDVA Act 2005 is not applicable if filed after the Hon. Family Court has granted NULLITY of MARRIAGE under sec.12(1)(a) of HMA or filing of DV by the wife after annulment of hindu marriage, as per hindu marriage act, is not sustainable, also is considered vexatious.....

2. CrPC 202 issued for an extortion case IPC 383 n 384, police submit enquiry n report saying no cognisable offence made out. Kindly provide judgements esp. of the Hon. SC & Mumbai HC which state irrespective of police report, the magistrate can issue process under CrPC 204 & shud not dismiss the complaint under CrPC 203. The complaint was filed with extortion charge i.e. Sec. 383, 384,since, money is demanded with threats of implicating in criminal cases, if demands not met & further a false criminal case of 498a is lodged, thus injury to repute, soul n mind is made by the accused, police when interrogated the accused he has given justification for the money demand as some kind of settlement amount & police gives b-report on the ground that it is all family matter, hence no case made out....the evidence filed by the complainant is the audio record of the call wherein money demand has been made without any word like settlement and all rough tone only, it is the police who feels that money demand is not unjust, however, it is actually a matter of trial, so process shud be issued, is what complainant feels....thus some citation which will relate above situation (CrPC 202, IPC 383, 384), etc...

awaiting at ur very earliest,
high regards
thank U

Dear Sir,

Kindly provide me with judgements of preferrably Gujarat HC or Hon. Supreme Court which support - 
1. PWDVA Act 2005 is not applicable if filed after the Hon. Family Court has granted NULLITY of MARRIAGE under sec.12(1)(a) of HMA or filing of DV by the wife after annulment of hindu marriage, as per hindu marriage act, is not sustainable, also is considered vexatious.....

2. CrPC 202 issued for an extortion case IPC 383 n 384, police submit enquiry n report saying no cognisable offence made out. Kindly provide judgements esp. of the Hon. SC which state irrespective of police report, the magistrate can issue process under CrPC 204 & shud not dismiss the complaint under CrPC 203. The complaint was filed with extortion charge i.e. Sec. 383, 384,since, money is demanded with threats of implicating in criminal cases, if demands not met & further a false criminal case is lodged, thus injury to repute, soul n mind is made by the accused, police when interrogated the accused he has given justification for the money demand as some kind of maintainence n settlement amount & police gives b-report on the ground that it is all family matter, hence no case made out....the evidence filed by the complainant is the audio record of the call wherein money demand has been made....thus some citation which will relate CrPC 202, IPC 383, 384, etc...

awaiting at ur very earliest,
high regards
thank U

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE, 1973—Section 482—Judges (Protection) Act, 1985—Sections 2 & 3—Penal Code, 1860—Sections 467, 468, 471 & 477-A—Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947—Section 5(1)(d)—Rajasthan Civil Services Pension Rules, 1996—R. 7(3)—Petition to quash FIR—Allegation of MISUSE of official position—At this stage it can not be accepted that petitioner acted as Judge & protection is available to him under the Act—No LIMITATION provided for the offence u/ss. 468, 467, 471, 420 & 120-B—Petitioner can not take the benefit of LIMITATION—Held, No case made out for quashing of FIR however petitioner can raise all the objection before the trial Court if charge-sheet is filed.


Santu Lal Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan, 2005(2) Cr.L.R. [Raj.] 1370.

The delayed contract execution was on the part of employer and the claimant is not allowed to claim compensation as per the agreement. But a nine months contract had prolonged for more than six years due to delay on account of employer.

Whether compensation claim cannot be entertained citing Ramnath International Construction Company case Supreme Court judgment of 2006 case?

The delayed contract execution was on the part of employer and the claimant is not allowed to claim compensation as per the agreement. But a nine months contract had prolonged for more than six years due to delay on account of employer.

Whether compensation claim cannot be entertained citing Ramnath International Construction Company case Supreme Court judgment of 2006 case?

I am a citizen in Kolkata. In my locality there is a common road of about 12' which is being over 30 years by the local people as their main entrance in this Gally. On dec 24th some people has blocked the road by bamboo fencing and threaten that this road is in their plot. But the local people is telling it is the common path for over 30 years and no one has given objection before. The Municipality has constructed drain according the road way. How the people can get back their road ? Please advise. 

i am fighting a case where the opposite party has not came into the witness box, but has had executed  a g.p.a .on inspecting the said G.P.a the signature of the party on replication as well as on advocted attorney are totally different from the view of naked eye the said document furthur doesn't have any witness its just notary attested. still the GPA exhibhits the document in the proceeding and on furthur application against it the judge doesn't wants it to be compared even private inspection is also not allowed. kindly help

Can anyone assist me on how to file a complaint before State Bar Council about the Advocate for his Professional Misconduct.