Start a new topic
Started by anshuman at 8:09 p.m. on 24 May 13
I would like to know, is there any act regarding Marriage/community hall. As there is a marriage hall running in-front of my house which is causing trouble ( Noise,Smoke from noisy diesel generator).
Started by Anonymous User at 11:26 p.m. on 23 May 13
a Muslim guy and gal get register marriage along with certificate, is it necessary fr both to get married as per their tradition ie Nikah also, or register marriage certificate is enough for them to prove, wat precaution to be taken to get settled and to avoid uncertainties
Started by sroyflatissue at 11:25 p.m. on 23 May 13
I have purchased an under construction flat from a reputed builder. It is an apartment complex with more than 250 flats. Before booking the flat I enquired a lot of about the legality of the property. The land was under a gram panchayat earlier, builder got approval from gram panchayat/BDO and started construction. Later the area was acquired by the city development authority.
City development authority evaluated the plan and determined that the G+8 construction is not permissible in that area and sent demolition notice to builder. The builder approached district court, and later High Court of the state and got judgment favoring them.
I read the honorable High Court order and decided to purchase the flat on condition that “builder will resolve all litigations for the property as and when it arises”. The same was written in the sale agreement document. My home loan was approved by SBI.
In the meantime City Development Authority appealed in front of Honorable Supreme Court. I got to know the SLP number. Since then I keep on checking the status/latest order of the SLP on Supreme Court website. There have been 4 dates till now, builder has not responded/provided required documents in Honorable Supreme Court.
The builder is planning to hand over the flat next month and pressurizing us to get the registration done. In the registration document, they are mentioning “the property is litigation free”. I have requested them to mention “litigation is pending, builder will be responsible in resolving the issue”, they rejected my request.
I purchased the flat just because they mentioned in the agreement that they will take care of all litigations. Now, they are not ready to mention the same in registration document. What can I do in this circumstance?
I read somewhere that the builder needs to obtain “Completion Certification” before handing over the property to buyers. Is that true?
If true, which authority will provide “Completion Certification”? Is it City Development Authority?
Should I wait for “Completion Certification” before getting the registration done?
What will happen if Honorable Supreme Court reverses the High Court order?
Few of my friends have already got the registration done. Will they be responsible for payment of legal battle with City Development Authority in future?
I have invested all my hard earn money in this flat. I have already paid 85% of total cost. Please help me.
Started by cityrohit at 9:32 a.m. on 23 May 13
our school is being run by the sabha.. it was private school at that time. in the year 1997 management accepted the grants from the state govt under 95% aided schools.in the year 2012 entire staff of the school who were being paid from the 95% grants were taken over by the Himachal government and the management stopped taking grants from the state govt. one year later the employees who were taken over by the applied for the gratuity claims under the gratuity act.our point of question is what would be the basis of salary calculations for the payment of gratuity. the salary paid from grants were high and the management normally pays much less salary to the employees who were not aided teachers.
Started by s1872j at 5:55 p.m. on 21 May 13
I am seeking your legal openion regarding applicability of gratuty in below case
a person has joined an organization , during his tenure with the organization, he got transfferd 5-6 times in diffrent establishments of the organization without completing 5 years in any of the company, though he has served almost 20 years in the organiztion.
my questeion is ,
wheather he is eligible for gratuity, if yes, what would be the period / tenure of service, if it is 20 years, reqested to please provide the reffrels / judgements
Started by burikar at 12:39 p.m. on 21 May 13
One of my client is a registered dealer under WB Vat and CST Act, they have make a petition before the Appellate Revision Board for the year 2004-05 . The grounds of Appeal revision is to produce the C-Form , D-Form F Form and Form 12 which they collected after completetion of Appeal case . They have all the documents in support of the forms as collected after Appeal Case, but the LR Copy of the bills are lost due to a severe fire held at their office sometimes in the year 2009. The proof of fire is very much existing. Now the point is that without this LR Copy Department is not acknowledging the claim . I Need your help if any case law either from high court , Tribunal or any other higher authority above the revision Board exists which explain the status in case loss of documents due to fire or natural calamity.
The Matter is very very urgent , please provide the case law details .
Started by Anonymous User at 9:33 a.m. on 21 May 13
ZSWO Ranga Reddy Dist has rejected my application for issue of a CAP Cert for my daughter stating "You have not commissioned to the ArmY from the State of AP".
To support their decision they have referred to :
a) My application dated 28 Mar 2013 along with my service particulars,my PPO, My ZSWO Ranga Reddy I card,my daughter's academic certificates etc as per their requirement based on GO 192 (To decide priority from one to 4,GO 370 to decide eligibility irrespective of nativity).
b)A memo issued by Directorate of Sainik Welfare wherein in it is stated how Education department (EC2)published GO 370 without giving any consideration to GO 192 on the issue of eligibility of ESMs irrespective of nativity to avail CAP quota for their children.The GO 192 issued a year earlier was also issued by the same Education Dept in AP.It is contended in that letter issued by the director in Directorate of AP Sainik Welfare that publication of GO 370 is not in the interest of the ex-servicemen of the state as had been represented by a few Ex-servicemen forums blah blah blah.In effect Director was seen settling his grudge with the Education Department in collusion with the Home Depat as Directorate of AP Sainik Welfare comes directly under HOME dEPARTMENT AP.
c) ZSWO RR has also referred to the order of Hon'ble AP high Court on Writ Appeals 951 &952 of 2006.Those petitioners registered themselves in the Zilla Sainik Welfare Boards in the States of their origin post retirement. A against them as the learned single judge found registration as ESM post retirement in the State of AP a mandatory requirement to avail CAP quota.One of them later transfered his registration to one of the Zilla Sainik Welfare Office of this State and filed Writ Appeal..But the division judge referred to DGR rule book (quoted..that one has to be domicile of that state to avail the facility offered by the State) to upheld the decision of the single judge.
The division bench however forgot to mention that GO 370 has already settled the matter on the issue of domicile to decide eligibility of an ESM who is registered by ZSWO of this State.
The ZSWO RR in collusion with his director and probably bureaucrats in the hOME Min who are in perpetual war with the bureaucrats in the Education Dept in the same govt has taken onto themselves to re-define nativity /domicile/eligibility of an ESM in the State of AP and hence rejected my application stating that you are not a domicile of the state of AP as you did not commission into the Army from the state of AP..
I would like to have your considered opinion on the issue as the decision if accepted by me will not only debar me from being domicile of this State in my lifetime..it will jeopardise the interest of my wife as well as my children who will then be considered persona non-grata.
Pl also advice me how to highlight this issue in the EX-SERVICEMEN SAMMELANS being held by the Formation Commanders attended by more than a lakh ESMs including a large numbers of retired Generals and their Equivalent ranks in Navy/Air Force who had not commissioned into the armed forces but considered part and parcel of this State so far.Most of those Ex servicemen Rally are attended by the Governor of the State as well.
Started by prcpani at 12:18 p.m. on 20 May 13
Please help me understand the summary of the case @ http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/53058912/
Started by Manpreet at 12:04 p.m. on 20 May 13
My wife is working and she is earning almost the same salary.But she does not contribute financially to run the house hold expenses.Neither she does any household work.She is just staying in my house as a guest.When i ask her to contribute she starts quarreling and threatens to file complain in CAW cell for harassment(Her logic is husband should spend money on everything).I have also discussed this with her parents ,they also says that give her some time she will also contribute.Is there any judgement which says that a working wife should also contribute in household expenses?please guide what to do?
Started by Anonymous User at 1:30 a.m. on 20 May 13
Can a person having LMV licence drive Motor Cycle Without Gear?