A GR-B , CENTRAL GOVT, GAZETTED OFFICER,OF AN INVESTIGATION WING WAS CHARGED FOR MAJOR PENALTY FOR LACK OF INTEGRITY FOR VIOLATION OF RULES 3(i)(ii), iii of ccs(cca)conduct Rules for the charge of attempting to receive bribe/ non denial of bribe ( stated to be heard the senior officers at Hq of the organization at Delhi when a mobile call was made by the complainant- manufacturer to the investigating officer stationed at 2000 kms away when bribe was offered over phone by the caller}. The controlling office who was posted at other metropolitan city and marshaling the investigation gone by the officer was completely kept in dark by the Delhi officer about their exercises. The officer who was under deputation was repatriated on the same day after few hours of the alleged mobile call to his parent Dept and the investigation case was transferred to other office. During departmental inquiry no call record was produced, no written complaint,No-entry of the complainants in the office record including visitor's register, no visitors slip was issued to the complainants, the complainants did not turned up after removal of the officer, the investigating officer faced the complainants only once while recording theie statements more than month ago of the call and the draft charge sheet against the manufacturer was forwarded to the controlling officer more than one month ago, no record to show that the complainants came to the Delhi office to lodge complaints and they never turned up during the inquiry,  thus there remained no scope on the part of the officer to give any undue favour to the complainants.
The final charge sheet was issued on the basis of draft charge sheet prepared by the investigating officer.Importantly, just before the removal of the officer a case of evasion of Rs. 60.00 Crores were forwarded by the investigating officer to conduct investigation by the officers of Delhi due to their locational advantage. THis has not been investigated till to day.
The investigating officer has been exonerated from all the charges in the Deptal inquiry approved by CVC after 6 years during which he was not given any sensitive charges. During deptal inquiry the officer submitted that he has become the victim of the conspiracy hatched to benefit the complainant,s factory by the  at the cost of his fame, image, career prospect and also at the cost of govt Exchequer seeking action against all the conspirators / perpetrators. In the meantime the demand of duty/ taxes/ penalty of RS. 156.00 Crores have been confirmed against the complainants firms& prosecution against the firms & complainants- directors have been sanctioned.
The exonerated investigating officer like to know the following:-
1. Whether there is any scope to take action against the conspirators / perpetrators?
2. If so, what should be the procedure and under which Rules & before whom?
3. Whether there is any scope to take course of Rule 19 of Conduct Rules,1964 ?
4. If so, how?
5. What charges under IPC/CrPC (including the Section/ Rules) could be brought against the conspirators / perpetrators? 
6. Whether the officers of Delhi and the complainants are to charged with as conspirators / perpetrators?
7.Whether there are any decided cases of Supreme /High Court in this matter?
8 I shall remain grateful if you kindly intimate me at my e-mail & may talk to me for any clarification at mobile No-94355-43978.