Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 382 docs - [View All]
The Punjab State, Chandigarh vs Sansari Mal Puran Chand on 22 August, 1967
State Of Punjab And Another vs Hari Krishan Sharma on 9 December, 1965
Nabha Rice And Oil Mills, Nabha vs State Of Punjab And Ors. on 18 February, 1963
Atlas Cycle Industries Ltd vs State Of Haryana & Anr on 11 August, 1971
Dhaunkal Sheo Ram vs Man Kauri Ram Jas And Anr. on 10 April, 1970

Loading...
User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 5 in The Punjab Laws Act, 1872
5. 4[ Decisions in certain cases to be according to Native law. In questions regarding succession, special property of females, betrothal, marriage, divorce, dower, adoption, guardianship, minority, bastardy, family relations, wills, legacies, gifts, partitions, or any religious usage or institution, the rule of decision shall be--
(a) any custom applicable to the parties concerned, which is not contrary to justice, equity or good conscience, and
1. Rep. by the Government of India Act, 1915. 2. Subs. by the Adaptation of Laws (No. 2) Order, 1956, for" constituting the States of Punjab and Delhi". 3. Subs., ibid., for" States of Punjab and Delhi". 4. Subs. by Act 12 of 1878, s. 1, for the original s. 5. The provisions of this section have been rep. in so far as they are inconsistent with those of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 (26 of 1937 ): see s. 6, ibid.
has not been, by this or any other enactment, altered or abolished, and has not been declared to be void by any competent authority;
(b) the Muhammadan law, in cases where the parties are Muhammadans, and the Hindu law, in cases where the parties are Hindus, except in so far as such law has been altered or abolished by legislative enactment, or is opposed to the provisions of this Act, or has been modified by any such custom as is above referred to.]