Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 17 docs - [View All]
Nalini Kumari, Major vs K.S. Bopaiah, Major on 24 November, 2006
Prakash Kumar Bachlaus vs Smt. Chanchal @ Jaya on 23 January, 2007
Raghubir Das vs Sarbamangala Das on 10 October, 2007
Jyotsnaben Ratilal vs Pravinchandra Tulsidas on 18 January, 2003
Suresh Bala vs G.M.S. Bala on 21 September, 1982

Loading...
User Queries
[Section 12] [Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 12(2) in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub- section (1), no petition for annulling a marriage-
(a) on the ground specified in clause (c) of sub- section (1) shall be entertained if-
(i) the petition is presented more than one year after the force had ceased to operate or, as the case may be, the fraud had been discovered; or
(ii) the petitioner has, with his or her full consent, lived with the other party to the marriage as husband or wife- after the force had ceased to operate or, as the case may be, the fraud had been discovered;
(b) on the ground specified in clause (d) of sub- section (1) shall be entertained unless the court is satisfied-
(i) that the petitioner was at the time of the marriage ignorant of the facts alleged;
(ii) that proceedings have been instituted in the case of a marriage solemnized before the commencement of this Act within one year of such commencement and in the case of marriages solemnized after such commencement within one year from the date of the marriage; and
(iii) that marital intercourse with the consent of the petitioner has not taken place since the discovery by the petitioner of the existence of 2[ the said ground].