Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer

Section 35 in The Indian Divorce Act, 1869 ["Complete Act"]

Citedby 17 docs - [View All]

Manekbai Nadirshaw Vachha vs Nadirshaw Jamshedji Vachha on 20 February, 1936

Manekbai Nadirshaw Vachha vs Nadirshaw Jamshedji Vachha on 20 February, 1936

V.H. Lopez vs E.J. Lopez on 8 September, 1885

Youd vs Youd And Ors. on 10 December, 1900

K. M. Butt vs F. C. K. Butt on 6 September, 1897


Loading...
Central Government Act
35. Power to order adulterer to pay costs.- Whenever in any petition presented by a husband the alleged adulterer has been made a co- respondent, and the adultery his began established, the Court may order the co- respondent to pay the whole or any part of the costs of the proceedings: Provided that the co- respondent shall not be ordered to pay the petitioner' s costs-
(1) if the respondent was, at the time of the adultery, living apart from her husband and leading the life of a prostitute, or
(2) if the co- respondent had not, at the time of the adultery, reason to believe the respondent to be a married woman. Power to order litiguous intervenor to pay costs. Power to order litigious intervenor to pay costs.- Whenever any application is made under section 17, the Court, if it thinks that the applicant had no grounds or no sufficient grounds for intervening, may order him to pay the whole or any part of the costs occasioned by the application.
IX. ALIMONY IX.- ALIMONY