Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 37 docs - [View All]
Mangilal Jawanmal And Ors. vs The Special Land Acquisition ... on 29 August, 1977
Sohrab N. Tavaria vs Jafferali G. Padamsee on 7 March, 1956
State Of Karnataka vs Laxuman on 25 October, 2005
Craft Centre And Ors. vs The Koncherry Coir Factories, ... on 7 July, 1990
Spl. Laq Officer vs Nathaji Kacharaji, Died, Thro' ... on 4 April, 2001

User Queries
[Section 18] [Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 18(2) in The Limitation Act, 1963
(2) Where the writing containing the acknowledgment is undated, oral evidence may be given of the time when it was signed; but subject to the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872 ), oral evidence of its contents shall not be received. Explanation.- For the purposes of this section,-
(a) an acknowledgment may be sufficient though it omits to specify the exact nature of the property or right, or avers that the time for payment, delivery, performance or enjoyment has not yet come or is accompanied by a refusal to pay, deliver, perform or permit to enjoy, or is coupled with a claim to set- off, or is addressed to a person other than a person entitled to the property or right,
(b) the word" signed" means signed either personally or by an agent duly authorised in this behalf, and
(c) an application for the execution of a decree or order shall not be deemed to be an application in respect of any property or right.