Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 5 docs
Pabba Laxmidevamma & 4 Others. vs Pabba Sekharaiah Goud. on 23 March, 2001
Sunil Chandra Ghosh vs Hemendra Kr. Deb on 26 November, 1984
Md. Tamrul Haque Choudhury vs Md. Monia Laskar And Anr. on 5 January, 2006
N.B. Namazi vs Central Chinmaya Mission Trust, ... on 12 December, 1986
Narinderjit Singh vs North Star Estate Promoters Ltd. on 8 May, 2012

User Queries
[Section 20(2)] [Section 20] [Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 20(2)(c) in The Specific Relief Act, 1963
(c) where the defendant entered into the contract under circumstances which though not rendering the contract voidable, makes it inequitable to enforce specific performance. Explanation 1.- Mere inadequacy of consideration, or the mere fact that the contract is onerous to the defendant or improvident in its nature, shall not be deemed to constitute an unfair advantage within the meaning of clause (a) or hardship within the meaning of clause (b). Explanation 2.- The question whether the performance of a contract would involve hardship on the defendant within the meaning of clause (b) shall, except in cases where the hardship has resulted from any act of the plaintiff subsequent to the contract, be determined with reference to the circumstances existing at the time of the contract.