Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Cites 5 docs
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 342 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 395 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 365 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 439 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860

Loading...
Gujarat High Court
Appearance : vs Ms on 20 July, 2012
Author: Sonia Gokani,

Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() {

var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") {

SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value = searchhi_string; if( location.hash.length > 1 ) location.hash = location.hash; }

}

Print

CR.MA/5091/2012 1/ 1 ORDER

IN

THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

CRIMINAL

MISC.APPLICATION No. 5091 of 2012

=========================================

RAJPAL

RAMPAL SHARMA AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY DARCL

Versus

STATE

OF GUJARAT & another

========================================= Appearance : MR

ZUBIN F BHARDA for Applicant

Ms.

Moxa Thakkar, APP, for Respondent(s) : 1, NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent(s) : 2,

=========================================

CORAM

:

HONOURABLE

MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI

Date

: 20/07/2012

ORAL

ORDER

This

application is filed by the original complainant under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [for short, 'the Code'], for cancellation of regular bail granted to respondent No.2, Amit Shri Premlal Bhutani, by the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Panchmahals at Godhra, vide order dated 2.2.2012 in Criminal Misc. Application No.61 of 2012, in connection with first information report registered at C.R.No.I-213 of 2011, with Halol police station for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 365 and 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

Having

heard the learned counsel for the applicant-original complainant and on perusal of the record, in my view, there is no glaring illegality committed by the trial court while enlarging the accused on regular bail. It goes without saying that the parameters for cancellation of bail and consideration weighed with the Court below while exercising power under Section 439 of the Code are different. Hence, no case is made out to entertain this application for cancellation of bail and this application is rejected. Notice is discharged.

(ANANT

S. DAVE, J.)

(swamy)

   

Top