Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer

Article 200 in The Constitution Of India 1949 [Constitution]

Cites 9 docs - [View All]

Constituent Assembly Debate On 1 August, 1949

Constituent Assembly Debate On 1 June, 1949

Constituent Assembly Debate On 17 October, 1949

Constituent Assembly Debate On 31 May, 1949

Constituent Assembly Debate On 30 May, 1949

Citedby 102 docs - [View All]

Inamdars Of Sulhnagar Colony And ... vs Government Of Andhra Pradesh And ... on 16 March, 1961

Har Govind Pant vs Chancellor, University Of ... on 8 November, 1977

V. Ramachandra Rao And Ors. vs The Andhra Pradesh Regional ... on 24 July, 1964

Indra Kumar vs State Of Bihar And Ors. on 8 April, 1988

Govind Anantrao Upadhya And Ors. vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors. on 12 October, 2000


Loading...
Central Government Act
200. Assent to Bills When a Bill has been passed by the Legislative Assembly of a State or, in the case of a State having a Legislative Council, has been passed by both Houses of the Legislature of the State, it shall be presented to the Governor and the Governor shall declare either that he assents to the Bill or that he withholds assent therefrom or that he reserves the Bill for the consideration of the President: Provided that the Governor may, as soon as possible after the presentation to him of the Bill for assent, return the Bill if it is not a Money Bill together with a message requesting that the House or Houses will reconsider the Bill or any specified provisions thereof and, in particular, will consider the desirability of introducing any such amendments as he may recommend in his message and, when a Bill is so returned, the House or Houses shall reconsider the Bill accordingly, and if the Bill is passed again by the House or Houses with or without amendment and presented to the Governor for assent, the Governor shall not withhold assent therefrom: Provided further that the Governor shall not assent to, but shall reserve for the consideration of the President, any Bill which in the opinion of the Governor would, if it became law, so derogate from the powers of the High Court as to endanger the position which that Court is by this Constitution designed to fill