Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 35 docs - [View All]
Ranganayaki Ammal And Others vs Controller Of Estate Duty. on 7 August, 1972
H.H. Maharaja Martand Singh Ju Deo vs Commissioner Of Expenditure-Tax on 8 December, 1981
Dix Jacob, S/O Jacob Vazhappilly vs The Government Of Kerala, Rep. By on 22 March, 2007
Thulasimani Ammal vs Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. on 30 September, 1999
Hotel Neelkamal, Through Its ... vs Assistant Commercial Tax ... on 4 April, 2006

User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 27 in The Gift- Tax Act, 1958
27. Hearing by High Court. When a case has been stated to the High Court under section 26, it shall be heard by a Bench of not less than two Judges of the High Court and shall be decided in accordance with the opinion of such Judges or of the majority of such Judges, if any: Provided that where there is no such majority, the Judges shall state the point of law upon which they differ and the case shall then
1. Ins. by Act 53 of 1962, s. 21 (w. e. f. 1- 4- 1963 ).
2. Subs. by s. 21, ibid., for sub- sections (7), (8) and (9) (w.. ef. 1- 4- 1963 ).
be heard upon that point only by one or more of the Judges of the High Court, and such point shall be decided according to the opinion of the majority of the Judges who have heard the case, including those who first heard it.