Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Cites 1 docs
Article 226 in The Constitution Of India 1949
Citedby 52 docs - [View All]
Anna Transport Corporation Ltd. vs Presiding Officer, Labour Court ... on 22 November, 1999
Sundaram G. vs Management Of Ramakrishna Steel ... on 20 April, 2000
Rajulu S. vs Management Of Aurofood Private ... on 9 February, 2001
National Horticultural Research vs P.Murugesan on 12 July, 2010
Krishnaveni Transports And Ors. vs Special Deputy Commissioner Of ... on 29 March, 1989

Loading...
User Queries
Madras High Court
The Management vs The Labour Court on 1 March, 2011

DATED: 01.03.2011

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN

Writ Petition No.6726 of 2006

The Management

S-1693,D.Perumalpalayam Primary

Agricultural Co-operative Bank,

D-Perumalpalayam, Salem District. Petitioner Vs

1. The Labour Court,

Salem.

2. K.Elumalai,

D.Perumapalayam

Salem District. Respondents

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the award dated 08.05.2003, in I.D.No.392/2002, and quash the same. For petitioner :Mr.K.Selvaraj

For respondent :Mr.S.Girija

O R D E R

At this stage of the hearing of the Writ petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that the second respondent had been reinstated in service, pursuant to the impugned award, dated 08.05.2003, made in I.D.No.392 of 2002.

2.He had also submitted that the second respondent had been reinstated in service on 24.05.2004, based on his undertaking, dated 14.08.2009, that he would not claim backwages, as per the impugned award, dated 08.05.2003.

3. The second respondent had also filed an affidavit, dated 28.02.2011, before this Court, stating that he had been reinstated in service, in S-1693,D.Perumalpalayam Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank,D-Perumalpalayam, Salem District and that he would not insist on the petitioner paying the back wages, as per the award of the first respondent, dated 08.05.2003. In such circumstances, since, no further orders are necessary, this Writ petition stands closed. arr

To

The Labour Court,

Salem