Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 360 docs - [View All]
Dashrathlal vs State on 26 July, 2011
Mallappa Basvantrao Desai vs Tukko Narasinha Mutalik on 14 August, 1936
Mallappa Basvantrao Desai vs Tukko Narasinha Mutalik And Ors. on 14 August, 1936
The Karnataka Land Developers ... vs The Commissioner, Bangalore ... on 11 September, 2006
Collector Of Bombay vs Burjor Hormusji Poonegar And Anr. on 18 December, 1961

Loading...
User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 9 in The Revenue Recovery Act, 1890
9. 5[ Recovery in India of land revenues, etc., accruing in Burma.
(1) The Central Government may direct 6[ that an arrear of land- revenue accruing in Burma or a sum recoverable in Burma as an arrear of land- revenue and payable to a Collector or other public officer or to a local authority in Burma may be recovered under this Act in 7[ India and thereupon such arrear or sum shall be so recoverable: Provided that the Central Government shall not give any such direction unless it is satisfied that the remedy available under section 4 of this Act in 7[ India to a person paying under protest in 7[ India an arrear accruing in 7[ India is available under Burma law in Burma to a person paying under protest in 7[ India an arrear accruing in Burma.
(2) For recovering by virtue of this section any arrears of tax or penalty due under the enactments relating to income- tax or supertax in force in Burma, the Collector shall have such additional powers as he has in the case of Indian income- tax and super- tax under the proviso to section 46 (2) of the Income- tax Act, 1922 (11 of 1922 .).
(3) 8[ Sub- sections (1) and (2) shall apply in relation to Pakistan as they apply in relation to Burma.]