Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 42 docs - [View All]
Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs V.P. Selvarajan on 11 June, 1991
Konia Trading Co. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 6 July, 2005
Ranutrol Ltd. vs Collector Of Customs on 4 July, 1995
Diary Den (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Commissioner Of Customs on 9 January, 2003
Raj Kishore Gupta vs Collector Of Customs on 30 October, 1989

User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 139 in The Customs Act, 1962
139. 1[ Presumption as to documents in certain cases. Where any do- cument-
(i) is produced by any person or has been seized from the custody or control of any person, in either case, under this Act or under any other law, or
(ii) has been received from any place outside India in the course of investigation of any offence alleged to have been committed by any person under this Act, and such document is tendered by the prosecution in evidence against him or against him and any other person who is tried jointly with him, the court shall--
(a) presume, unless the contrary is proved, that the signature and every other part of such document which purports to be in the handwriting of any particular person or which the court may reasonably assume to have been signed by, or to be in the handwriting of, any particular person, is in that person' s handwriting, and in the case of a document executed or attested, that it was executed or attested by the person by whom it purports to have been so executed or attested;
(b) admit the document in evidence, notwithstanding that it is not duly stamped, if such document is otherwise admissible in evidence;
(c) in a case falling under clause (i) also presume, unless the contrary is proved, the truth of the contents of such document.] 2[ Explanation.-- For the purposes of this section," document" includes inventories, photographs and lists certified by a Magistrate sub- section (1C) of section 110.]