Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 20 docs - [View All]
Krishnadas Tulsidas vs Dwarkadas Kaliandas on 10 January, 1936
Smt. Uma Sharma & Anr vs Shri Kamal Kumar Bhanot & Ors on 5 November, 2003
Smt. Uma Sharma & Anr vs Shri Kamal Kumar Bhanot & Ors on 5 November, 2003
T.N. Krishna Pillai vs K. Nallaperumal on 4 October, 2002
Chinnammal And Ors. vs Sri Kannikaparameshwari Deity By ... on 19 July, 1963

Loading...
User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 97 in The Indian Succession Act, 1925
97. Effect of words describing a class added to bequest to person.- Where property is bequeathed to a person, and words are added which describe a class of persons but do not denote them as direct objects of a distinct and independent gift, such person is entitled to the whole interest of the testator therein, unless a contrary intention appears by the will. Illustrations
(i) A bequest is made-- to A and his children, to A and his children by his present wife, to A and his heirs, to A and the heirs of his body, to A and the heirs male of his body, to A and the heirs female of his body, to A and his issue, to A and his family, to A and his descendants, to A and his representatives, tp A and his personal representatives, to A, his executors and administrators. In each of these cases, A takes the whole interest which the testator had in the property.
(ii) A bequest is made to A and his brothers. A and his brothers are jointly entitled to the legacy.
(iii) A bequest is made to A for life and after his death to his issue. At the death of A the property belongs in equal shares to all persons who then answer the description of issue of A.