Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 22 docs - [View All]
Firm Of Pratapchand Nopaji vs Firm Of Kotrike Venkatta Setty & ... on 12 December, 1974
Shree Digvijay Cement Co. Ltd. vs The State Trading Corporation Of ... on 17 March, 2006
Kandaswamy Pillai vs Avayambal Alias Thangaohi Ammal on 17 March, 1910
Kandaswami Pillai vs Avayambal Alias Thangachi Ammal on 17 March, 1910
Upendra Nath vs Kumar Bimalendu on 17 January, 1944

Loading...
User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 222 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872
222. Agent to be indemnified against consequences of lawful acts.- The employer of an agent is bound to indemnify him against the consequences of all lawful acts done by such agent in exercise of the authority Conferred upon him. Illustrations
(a) B, at Singapur, under instructions from A of Calcutta, contracts with C to deliver certain goods to him. A does not send the goods to B, and C sues B for breach of contract. B informs A of the suit, and A authorizes him to defend the suit. B defends the suit, and is compelled to pay damages and costs, and incurs expenses. A is liable to B for such damages, costs and expenses.
(b) B, a broker at Calcutta, by the orders of A, a merchant there, contracts with C for the purchase of 10 casks of oil for A. Afterwards A refuses to receive the oil, and C sues B. B informs A, who repudiates the contract altogether. B defends, but unsuccessfully, and has to pay damages and costs and incurs expenses. A is liable to B for such damages, costs and expenses.