Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Cites 7 docs - [View All]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 147 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 148 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860

Loading...
User Queries
Gujarat High Court
Raysing vs State on 20 July, 2012
Author: Md Shah,

Gujarat High Court Case Information System BODY {SCROLLBAR-FACE-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-HIGHLIGHT-COLOR: #808080; SCROLLBAR-SHADOW-COLOR: #d4d0c8; SCROLLBAR-ARROW-COLOR: #ffffff; scrollbar-dark-shadow-color: #ffffff} SPAN.searchword { background-color:yellow; } function loadSearchHighlight() {

var chkParamC = "txtSearch" if (chkParamC == "txtSearch") {

SearchHighlight(); document.searchhi.h.value = searchhi_string; if( location.hash.length > 1 ) location.hash = location.hash; }

}

Print

CR.MA/9650/2012 3/ 3 ORDER

IN

THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

CRIMINAL

MISC.APPLICATION No. 9650 of 2012

=========================================================

RAYSING

NANABHAI MACHHAR & 4 - Applicant(s)

Versus

STATE

OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)

========================================================= Appearance

:

MR

YM THAKKAR for

Applicant(s) : 1 - 5. MR LB DABHI, APP for Respondent(s) : 1,

=========================================================

CORAM

:

HONOURABLE

MR.JUSTICE MD SHAH

Date

: 20/07/2012

ORAL

ORDER

By

way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants have prayed to release them on regular bail in connection with CR No.I-26 of 2012 registered with Bakor Police Station, for the offence punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 324 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Sec.135 of B.P.Act.

Heard

Mr.Y.M.Thakkar, learned counsel for the applicants Mr.L.B.Dabhi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State.

It

is submitted by Mr.Thakkar that this application is filed after filing of charge sheet. It is further submitted that incident took place in a spur of moment. It is further submitted the main accused Uda Nana asked other persons to beat the deceased as well as other persons. It is further submitted that applicant No.1 came with axe and caused injuries with blunt part of axe to injured Ramanbhai Galabhai on his back and applicant No.3 also came with axe and caused injury to the complainant and all the injuries were simple in nature. It is further submitted that considering the manner in which the incident is alleged to have occurred and also the fact that the charge sheet is filed, applicants may be released on bail.

It

is to be noted that the charge sheet is filed. Considering the manner in which the incident has taken place and considering the role attributed to the applicants coupled with the facts that the applicants have not caused injury to the deceased, without entering into the merits of the case, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion to enlarge the applicants on bail.

Hence,

the applicants are ordered to be released on bail in connection with CR No.I-26 of 2012 registered with Bakor Police Station for the offence alleged against them in this application on each of them executing personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with one solvent surety each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that -

a) they

shall not take undue advantage of liberty or abuse liberty;

b) they

shall not to try to tamper or pressurise the prosecution witnesses or complainant in any manner;

c) they

shall maintain law and order and should cooperate the Investigating Officer;

d) they

shall not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;

e) they

shall not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;

f)

furnish the address of their residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court with documentary proof of residence at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;

g) surrender

their passport, if any, to the lower Court within a week.

If

the breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concerned Court will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.

Bail

before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It would be open to the trial Court concerned to give time to furnish the solvency certificate if prayed for. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.

At

the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicants on bail.

Since

this order has been passed considering the role attributed to the applicants, this order may not be taken as a precedent.

[M.D.SHAH,J.]

radhan

   

Top