Mobile View
Main Search Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 9 docs - [View All]
Aparna Trading Corporation (I) ... vs Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes ... on 28 June, 1982
Sreematy Bajroga Khatun And Ors. vs Province Of Bengal And Ors. on 24 May, 1939
Dr. Zubida Begum vs Indian Bank on 28 August, 2012
Poonam Garg vs The Chief Manager, State Bank Of ... on 10 January, 2014
Uco Bank vs Gammon India Ltd. on 20 April, 2006

[Section 20] [Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 20(3) in The Limitation Act, 1963
(3) For the purposes of the said sections,—
(a) an acknowledgment signed or a payment made in respect of any liability by or by the duly authorised agent of, any limited owner of property who is governed by Hindu law, shall be a valid acknowledgment or payment, as the case may be, against a reversioner succeeding to such liability; and
(b) where a liability has been incurred by or on behalf of a Hindu undivided family as such, an acknowledgment or payment made by, or by the duly authorised agent of, the manager of the family for the time being shall be deemed to have been made on behalf of the whole family.