Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 72 docs - [View All]
Union Of India (Uoi) vs Shonkh Technologies ... on 20 April, 2006
The Barium Chemicals Ltd. And Anr vs The Company Law Board And Others on 4 May, 1966
Rohtas Industries vs S.D. Agarwal And Ors. on 16 December, 1968
Jiyajeerao Cotton Mills Ltd. vs Company Law Board And Ors. on 16 January, 1969
Rohtasindustries Ltd vs S.D. Agarwal & Anr on 16 December, 1968

Loading...
[Section 237] [Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 237(b) in The Companies Act, 1956
(b) may do so if, in the opinion of the 2[ Company Law Board] there are circumstances suggesting--
(i) that the business of the company is being conducted with intent to defraud its creditors, members or any other persons, or otherwise for a fraudulent or unlawful purpose, or in a manner oppressive of any of its members, or that the company was formed for any fraudulent or unlawful purpose;
(ii) that persons concerned in the formation of the company or the management of its affairs have in connection therewith been guilty of fraud, misfeasance or other misconduct towards the company or towards any of its members; or
1. Subs. by Act 31 of 1988, s. 37 (w. e. f. 31. 5. 1991 ).
2. Subs. by s. 38, ibid. (w. e. f. 31. 5. 1991 )
(iii) that the members of the company have not been given all the information with respect to its affairs which they might reasonably expect, including information relating to the calculation of the commission payable to a managing or other director, 1[ or the manager, of the company.