Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 97 docs - [View All]
State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Zavad Zama Khan on 4 May, 1984
Raj Bahadur Yadav vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors. on 21 March, 1997
Hitendra Nath Goswami vs State Of Assam And Ors. on 6 January, 1984
Sunil Fulchand Shah vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 29 April, 1988
Mahamani vs The Union Of India Rep. But Its ... on 7 December, 1999

User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 11 in The National Security Act, 1980
11. Procedure of Advisory Boards.
(1) The Advisory Board shall, after considering the materials placed before it and, after calling for such further information as it may deem necessary from the appropriate Government or from any person called for the purpose through the appropriate Government or from the person concerned, and if, in any particular case, it considers it essential so to do or if the person concerned
desires to be heard, after hearing him in person, submit its report to the appropriate Government within seven weeks from the date of detention of the person concerned.
(2) The report of the Advisory Board shall specify in a separate part thereof the opinion of the Advisory Board as to whether or not there is sufficient cause for the detention of the person concerned.
(3) When there is a difference of opinion among the members forming the Advisory Board, the opinion of the majority of such members shall be deemed to be the opinion of the Board.
(4) Nothing in this section shall entitle any person against whom a detention order has been made to appear by any legal practitioner in any matter connected with the reference to the Advisory Board; and the proceedings of the Advisory Board and its report, excepting that part of the report in which the opinion of the Advisory Board is specified, shall be confidential.