Mobile View
Main Search Advanced Search Disclaimer
User Queries
View the actual judgment from court
Karnataka High Court
Sri Manoj Padikkal vs State By White Field P S on 14 October, 2010
Author: V.Jagannathan

. AND: .. a

C1.

IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THXS THE 14%! DAY OF OCTOBER, 2010 BEFORE _

THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE "VJAGANNATHAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO4965/2010 CV

BETWEEN:

1. Sri. Manoj Padikkal

Aged about 39 years

S/O P.Gopala Krishnan Nair

Resident of # M.R.304 " _

F'~Wing, Mittal Tower Residenucyé' _ 1VI.G.ROad _

Bangalore - 560 001, ._

2. Sri.-Jalesh Kumar

Major in Age V 1 .1

S / 0 T.P.Bhag'C{*aLSing_h g ~ #101, Alpha Ci'-ir_1_estOr1_

Carlestoio

Bangalore.' _ '-- __ ....PETmON}.:Rs

VA ., (By4VSriZ'€;N.Kumar, Adv.)

'State'by '»Vhite*.I;'ie.}.d 13.3.,

RVepreAserfi:ed..Vby }3'1_1Ij1iCe Prosecutor Office of 'thefidvoeate General

' Bangalore. " ,..RESPONDENT

(By Sr'1.G.M.SriniVasa Reddy, HCGP}

Bars CRIMINAL PE'IT'I'1ON IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439

% CR.PF.C PRAYING THAT THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO 'v.ENLARGE THE PEFITIONERS ON BAIL IN THE EVENT OF THEIR __ ARREST IN CR.NO.223/10 OF WHITE FIELD 13.5., BANOALORB cm', 'WHICH IS REGD, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 3(A] & {B}, 4, 5, 7, OF

PIT ACT.

_2_

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY. THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

Heard both sides in respect of the anticiplattoiyrpp.

petition filed by accused Nos.13 and 14 who are

accused persons whom the accused:'has"oeenp regislteredxinder

Section 3(ii} [a)(b], 4, 5 & '7 of ln1rnoral__ "traffic »('I'reVentior;i]~..l°blc't,p

1956.

2. Submission of Kiinlar is that, petitioners are the._Directors._of known as "Fruit Wellness & in the business of Herbal Beauty" Spa Treatments etc. and they alleged offences and more over the already on bail, following the

trial Court rantiln ato bail. j _ g be P TY

_p3._VvA}:1av*.iiIg;,'. heard the petitioner's counsel and also the

__ Government Pleader for the State and in

. viewllof the accused persons, accused Nos.1 to 12 and accused

M K being released on anticipatory bail by the trial Court, I am

_l of tlieyiew that. the petitioners can be directed to approach the

" -trial Court for regular bail by granting the anticipatory bail.

4. In the result, the petition is allowed. in the event of petitioners being arrested in Crime No.223/2010 of White Field ii

/

,. J'

-3-

police, they shall be released on bail on executing personal bond for Rs.50,000/-- each with two sureties to the satisfaction.-of the

arresting police officer. Petitioners shall not tarr1per--'_vvitfl'i.Vg."tl1,e

evidence and shall not hamper investigation '

Petitioners shall mark their attendance ,_l_:>eforeVllthelfvconcernedllit

police on every Sunday at any time betiveeifi

p.m. and shall also co--operate wlth'~the investigating lagengcyi.

5. Petitioners shall move the Vt'rial"*Courttwithiri 25 days from the date of this order' toy. till such time.

this order shall be ll'l'fQI'C€.i"W * " I 7 11 it 3d/'L

*: llr =]udge