Mobile View
Main Search Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 33 docs - [View All]
Ajit Kumar Iddya vs Institute Of Chartered ... on 17 August, 1993
Amar Nath Malhetra vs M.C.S. Limited on 29 May, 1992
V.V. Krishna Iyer Sons vs New Era Manufacturing Co. Ltd., ... on 9 December, 1964
M.S. Kabli vs Union Of India & Ors. on 22 February, 2011
Council Of The Institute Of ... vs Awadhesh Kumar & Anr. on 10 July, 2012

User Queries
[Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 225 in The Companies Act, 1956
225. Provisions as to resolutions for appointing or removing auditors.
(1) Special notice shall be required for a resolution at an annual general meeting appointing as auditor a person other than a retiring auditor, or providing expressly that a retiring auditor shall not be re- appointed.
(2) On receipt of notice of such a resolution, the company shall forthwith send a copy thereof to the retiring auditor.
(3) Where notice is given of such a resolution and the retiring auditor makes with respect thereto representations in writing to the company (not exceeding a reasonable length) and requests their notification to members of the company, the company shall, unless the representations are received by it too late for it to do so,-
(a) in any notice of the resolution given to members of the company, state the fact of the representations having been made; and
(b) send a copy of the representations to every member of the company to whom notice of the meeting is sent, whether before or after the receipt of the representations by the company;
1. Added by Act 31 of 1988, s. 34 (w. e. f. 15- 6- 1988 ).
and if a copy of the representations is not sent as aforesaid because they were received too late or because of the company' s default, the auditor may (without prejudice to his right to be heard orally) require that the representations shall be read out at the meeting: Provided that copies of the representations need not be sent out and the representations need not be read out at the meeting if, on the application either of the company or of any other person who claims to be aggrieved, the 1 Company Law Board] is satisfied that the rights conferred by this sub- section are being abused to secure needless publicity for defamatory matter; and the 1 Company Law Board] may order the company' s costs on such an application to be paid in whole or in part by the auditor, notwithstanding that he is not a party to the application.
(4) Sub- sections (2) and (3) shall apply to a resolution to remove the first auditors or any of them under sub- section (5) of section 224 or to the removal of any auditor or auditors under sub- section (7) of that section, as they apply in relation to a resolution that a retiring auditor shall not be re- appointed.