Mobile View
Main Search Forums Advanced Search Disclaimer
Citedby 92 docs - [View All]
Quamarul Islam vs S.K. Kanta And Others on 21 January, 1994
Quamarulislam vs S.K. Kanta And Ors on 21 January, 1994
Kanti Prasad Jayshanker Yagnik vs Purshottamdas Ranchhoddas Patel ... on 24 January, 1969
Shri Dharamvir vs Amar Singh & Ors on 6 February, 1996
Manubhai, Nandlal Amersey vs Popatial Manilal Joshi & Ors on 7 January, 1969

Loading...
User Queries
[Section 123] [Complete Act]
Central Government Act
Section 123(2) in The Representation Of The People Act, 1951.
(2) Undue influence, that is to say, any direct or indirect interference or attempt to interfere on the part of the candidate or his agent, or of any other person 1[ with the consent of the candidate or his election agent], with the free exercise of any electoral right: Provided that-
(a) without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of this clause any such person as is referred to therein who-
(i) threatens any candidate or any elector, or any person in whom a candidate or an elector is interested, with injury of any kind including social ostracism and ex- communication or expulsion from any caste or com- munity; or
(ii) induces or attempts to induce a candidate or an elector to believe that he, or any person in whom he is interested, will become or will be rendered an object of divine displeasure or spiritual censure, shall be deemed to interfere with the free exercise of the electoral right of such candidate or elector within the meaning of this clause;
1. Subs. by Act 47 of 1966, s. 53, for" withdrawing" (w. e. f. 14- 12- 1966 ).
2. Subs. by s. 53, ibid., for" to withdraw" (w. e. f. 14- 12- 1966 ).
3. Ins. by Act 58 of 1958, s. 36.
(b) a declaration of public policy, or a promise of public action, or the mere exercise of a legal right without intent to interfere with an electoral right, shall not be deemed to be interference within the meaning of this clause.