Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
1 - 10 of 366 (0.22 seconds)

Partner Suresh Kumar entered into a joint development agreement dated 17.5.2006 under which the respondent undertook development activities such ... single Judge held that in pursuance to the joint development agreement and subsequent agreement entered into between the parties
Madras High Court
- Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
under the head 'capital gains' by misreading the Joint Development agreement as 'sale deed'. 2. That the authorities has grossly ... tripartite 2 ITA No.697(Asr)/2013 Joint Development Agreement by the Society with M/s. Hash Builders and with
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Amritsar
- Cites 38 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
cancellation due to non-execution of a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) dt.25.9.2004 from M/s. Nitesh Estates ... Appellant had entered into a joint development agreement with M/s Nitesh Estates Private Limited
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore
- Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
develop the same by entering into a joint development agreement and was on 4 the look out for prospective ... agreed land value as on the date of joint development which was ` 200 crores, as professional fee to the petitioner
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document
applicant states that pursuant to the aforesaid joint development agreement dated 17.05.2006 were considered necessary the parties herein held mutual ... development on 11.06.2008 and both earlier agreements and the supplemental agreements are inter dependent, but the terms of the agreement
Madras High Court
- Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
property on the date of signing of tripartite Joint Development Agreement ("the Agreement") itself, in terms of sub section ... Housing Society of MLAs entered into a tripartite Joint Development Agreement (herein after referred as "JDA") with HASH Builders
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Chandigarh
- Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
that they had entered into an agreement with one Smt. Suganthi under Joint Development Agreement dated 4.3.1996. In terms ... owners of the property had entered into the Joint Development Agreement on 4.3.1996 with the third respondent Smt. Suganthi
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 2 - Cited by 0 -
2005 CriLJ 2674
- K Manjunath - Full Document
granted. Heard. 2. The appellant alleges that a joint development agreement dated 18.2.2007 was entered into between "Father A.John ... development agreement, but will have no bearing on the validity of the arbitration agreement (Clause 18 of the agreement), which
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - R.V.Raveendran - Full Document
filed a separate written statement admitting execution of joint development agreement by his father. It was also contended that granting ... residential complex to be constructed as per joint development agreement under which the owner had agreed to sell
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document
justified in falling to appreciate various terms of Joint Development Agreement which clearly indicated that the appellant was not mute ... housing project. Therefore, being co-venturer in the Joint Development Agreement, he is eligible for benefit of deduction
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore
- Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -