Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 5718 (1.12 seconds)

statute in so far as they are inconsistent. Incidentally the learned Counsel also argued that the parties did not contemplate ... governed by terms and conditions which may be inconsistent with some of the provisions of the Act. There
Madras High Court
- Cites 4 - Cited by 10 -
(1949) 2 MLJ 694
- P Rajamannar
statute in so far as they are inconsistent. Incidentally, the learned counsel also argued that the parties did not contemplate ... governed by terms and conditions which may be inconsistent with some of the provisions of the Act. There
Madras High Court
- Cites 4 - Cited by 5 -
AIR 1950 Mad 284
- Rajamannar
Supreme Court of India Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd vs Essar Power Ltd on 13
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 24 - Cited by 33 - M Katju
provisio. But consistency with the proviso, incidentally, meant inconsistency with the Notification. This inconsistency was, later on, removed
Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Delhi
- Cites 10 - Cited by 0 -
2003 (86) ECC 375
State Act in the Concurrent List are fully inconsistent and are absolutely irreconcilable, the Central Act will prevail ... State List an entrenchment, if any, being purely incidental or inconsequential. (iv) Where, however, a law made by the State
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 61 - Cited by 268 -
1979 AIR 898
also contain such other supplemental, incidental and consequential provisions not inconsistent with this Act as may be deemed necessary ... State Administrative Tribunal and such other incidental and consequential provisions not inconsistent with this Act as may be deemed necessary
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 62
this Act; (c) generally make such incidental, supplementary or ancillary provisions, not inconsistent with this Act, as may be deemed
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 34
arising under this Act; (d) make such incidental and ancillary provisions, not inconsistent with this Act, as may be deemed
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 12
Supreme Court of India Income-Tax Officer, Award, ... vs Murlitdhar Bhagwandas, ... on 29 January, 1964
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 37 - Cited by 11 -
1965 AIR 342
unexpressed limitations?, (2) Whether the impugned Act is inconsistent with, or restricts the applicant's right to, freedom Of speech ... incidental effect of the working of the Act and the Act cannot be said to be inconsistent with Article
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 46 - Cited by 6 -
AIR 1955 All 193
- Desai
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next