1 - 10 of 4554 (0.38 seconds)
right of a coparcener to
maintain a suit for permanent injunction under section 38
of, restraining the manager or Karta ... suit in the Court of the Sub-Judge for
permanent injunction, restraining the defendant No.1 from
selling or alienating
Supreme Court of India
disturbed his possession. Suit No. 79/49 was for permanent injunction
restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession ... from Kalyana Sundram Iyer
but the suit was for permanent injunction and since the plaintiff was not in
actual possession
Supreme Court of India
Misra, C.J.
1. Plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants
from interfering with her possession and enjoyment ... Counsel for the petitioner contends that a suit for permanent
injunction cannot abate under the provisions of the Orissa
Orissa High Court
sought the relief of permanent
injunction restraining the defendants from in any way interfering with the
plaintiff's right ... untrue and thus, the plaintiff was not
entitled for permanent injunction asked
Madras High Court
under :---
"In a suit simpliciter for a permanent injunction, is it necessary
to frame an issue of tenancy either ... Civil Judge (Junior
Division), Bevarai, District Beed, for a permanent injunction
simpliciter for restraining the defendant No. 1---Ganpatrao
Bombay High Court
consideration in these revisions is
whether a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from
interfering with the plaintiffs' possession ... title to the
suit lands and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant
from interfering with his peaceful possession
Orissa High Court
present
respondent against the present appellants for permanent injunction
restraining the appellants from interfering with her peaceful
possession and enjoyment ... held that the plaintiff is not entitled
to permanent injunction and consequently dismissed the suit without
costs. Aggrieved
Andhra High Court
noticed that in a suit for permanent
injunction under Section 58 of the Specific Relief Act by a
coparcener against ... suit. Secondly, the plaintiff-respondents brought this suit for
permanent injunction restraining their father, defendant 1, from
selling or alienating
Madras High Court
that she is the Legal Heir of Chinnapoovan;
(ii) permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 to 3 from
interfering with ... Chinnapoovan of plaint A Schedule
immovable property;
(iii) permanent injunction restraining the defendants 1 to 3 from
withdrawing the Fixed
Madras High Court
suit of the 2nd defendant for permanent injunction has been
dismissed and in OS No. 11/89, suit ... meantime, the 3rd
defendant had filed a suit for permanent injunction against the 1st
plaintiff and her husband K. Ramankutty
Andhra High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -