Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
1 - 10 of 4733 (0.36 seconds)

disturbed his possession. Suit No. 79/49 was for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the possession ... from Kalyana Sundram Iyer but the suit was for permanent injunction and since the plaintiff was not in actual possession
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 4 - Cited by 10 - Kapadia - Full Document
sought the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from in any way interfering with the plaintiff's right ... untrue and thus, the plaintiff was not entitled for permanent injunction asked
Madras High Court
- Cites 0 - Cited by 10 - Full Document
right of a coparcener to maintain a suit for permanent injunction under section 38 of, restraining the manager or Karta ... suit in the Court of the Sub-Judge for permanent injunction, restraining the defendant No.1 from selling or alienating
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 12 - Cited by 69 -
1988 AIR 576
- B Ray - Full Document
agreement of sale of immovable property, for damages and permanent injunction. Admittedly, no regular agreement of sale was entered into ... suit in O.S.No.6514 of 2002 for permanent injunction restraining the defendant, his men, agents and servants from
Madras High Court
- Cites 24 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
respondent-plaintiff filed the said suit for granting permanent injunction restraining the appellants-defendants from interfering with his possession ... alleged.Hence, the plaintiff is not entitled for the permanent injunction as prayed for. 3. The trial Court settled
Andhra High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 2 -
1998 (6) ALD 278
- Full Document
possession of the plaint schedule property, for permanent injunction and for other consequential reliefs. Similarly, O.S.No. 10261 ... entitled for an order of permanent injunction. 4. Whether plaintiff proves that the decree passed
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 1 -
AIR 2007 Kant 91
- N Kumar - Full Document
wherein it is held that 'earlier suit was for permanent injunction restraining defendant from alienating suit property and the subsequent ... filed by the plaintiff against the defendants was for permanent injunction restraining vendor from alienating the property to defendant. During
Madras High Court
- Cites 11 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
Whether the plaintiff is entitled for permanent injunction as prayed for? OPP. 7. Relief." 6. At the time of hearing ... held not entitled to the relief of declaration or permanent injunction. 7. The findings rendered on issues
Delhi High Court
- Cites 32 - Cited by 1 - R Khetrapal - Full Document
second appeal has arisen out of a suit for permanent injunction. The case as made out in the plaint ... defendants. Accordingly the plaintiffs filed the instant suit for permanent injunction. 2. The defendant No. 2 contested the suit
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 29 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 2005 Cal 178
- A K Mitra - Full Document
BANGALORE CITY, (CCH:15), DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION, PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND MANDATORY INJUNCTION. 2 THIS RFA COMING ... suit of the plaintiff for declaration, mandatory injunction and permanent injunction. 2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - N A Rao - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -