Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
Did you search for 70b
1 - 10 of 71 (0.49 seconds)

said deeds in respect of the said properties No. 70B, Rash Behari Avenue, Calcutta or the property at Mayapur Srichaitanya ... Gour Sundar Daitya Kunja Jew located at No. 70B, Rash Behari Avenue, Calcutta-26, from selling, letting out, encumbering, making
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 13 - Cited by 3 -
AIR 1985 Cal 176
- B Ray
properties and affairs including Sree Chaitanya Research Institute at 70B, Rash Behari Avenue, Calcutta. The plaintiffs also prayed for further ... temples, maths and buildings including the said premises No. 70B, Rash Behari Avenue, Calcutta and also the alleged right
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 11 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 1999 Cal 132
- S B Roy
Central Government Act Section 70B(2) in The Insurance Act, 1938 (2) Every provident society registered under the provisions
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0
Central Government Act Section 70B(3) in The Insurance Act, 1938 (3) When any alteration occurs or is made which
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0
Central Government Act Section 70B in The Insurance Act, 1938 70B. Supplementary information and reports of alterations in particulars furnished
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0
agency established under sub-section(1) of section 70B;’.’.             (10)   Page 3,          lines
Lok Sabha Debates
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0
Radhy Dayita Kunja Behari Jew, all installed at 70B, Rash Behari Avenue, Calcutta In the said deed of appointment ... absolute owner of the said premises No. 70B, Rash Behari Avenue, Calcutta. 5. It is the plaintiffs' case that
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 4 - Cited by 7 -
AIR 1983 Cal 420
- M M Dutt
empowered to revoke, the suspension order under Section 70B of the Act is not well founded, because from a bare ... perusal of the provisions of Section 70B of the Act it is quite obvious that the State Government
Rajasthan High Court
- Cites 3 - Cited by 0 -
1981 WLN 26
disposed of, the petitioner had applied under Section 70B. But the fact that an application is made under Section ... 70B does not establish any right in the petitioner to contend that he has been rightfully in possession
Bombay High Court
- Cites 2 - Cited by 1 -
AIR 1973 Bom 192
Kumar Ghosal, (Serial No. 59A), Subir Sinha (Serial No. 70B). Dwipen Biswas (Serial No. 58b) and Subhajit Banerjee, (Serial
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 20 - Cited by 0 -
(2001) 1 CALLT 535 HC
- S Sen
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Next