1 - 10 of 7813 (0.98 seconds)
VIII,
pages 229-245.
°See Mulla, Law of Insolvency in India (1958), page 16.
2
A further step ... Provincial Act
o rgoy.
2See also Mulla (1958), page 19.
°See, ibid.
3
judgment obtained. Creditors of a debtor were
Law Commission Report
unqualiiied
r. rf, the discussion in Mulla, (1963), page 14S, 13th line and page 149.
2. See also the review ... Mulla (1963}, deals with the matter at pages 6-7.
;. Sixth Report, page 9, paragraph 2I{B).
4. cf. Sixth
Law Commission Report
Supreme Court of India
A.A. Mulla And Others vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr on 28 October, 1996 Author ... Bench: G Ray, G Pattanaik
PETITIONER:
A.A. MULLA AND OTHERS
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
DATE
Supreme Court of India
Madras High Court
Mulla Vittil Seethi vs Korambath Paruthooli Achuthan ... on 12 January, 1911 Equivalent citations
Madras High Court
Supreme Court of India
Sheikh Abdul Kayum vs Mulla Alibhai on 17 August, 1962 Equivalent citations ... Gupta, K Das
PETITIONER:
SHEIKH ABDUL KAYUM
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
MULLA ALIBHAI
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
17/08/1962
BENCH:
GUPTA
Supreme Court of India
offered Rs. 2,000/to
P.W. 12 a Mulla to collect votes for him, and though ... villages in which he happened to be the
Mulla. Another witness stated that the appellant told him
that
Supreme Court of India
Author: R Misra
Bench: R Misra, A Mulla, B Nigam
JUDGMENT
R.A. Misra, J.
1. This appeal has been ... appeal was heard by a Bench constituted of Mulla and Nigam, JJ,
Both the learned Judges delivered their judgments separately
Allahabad High Court
Court of India
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, ... vs Thayaballi Mulla Jeevaji Kapasi ... on 15 March, 1967 Equivalent citations ... Sikri, V Ramaswami
JUDGMENT
Shah, J.
1. Thayaballi Mulla Jeevaji - hereinafter called "the respondent" - was
a trader in "Malabar produce
Supreme Court of India
Madras High Court
Mulla Vittil Seeti Kutti And Ors. vs K.M.K. Kunhi Pathumma And Ors. on 23 April
Madras High Court
Appeals Nos. 1332 and 1476
of 1954.
A. N. Mulla, B. B. Tawakley, J. P. Goyal, A. Banerji ... first point raised by Mr. A. N. Mulla on behalf of the
appellants was that no sanction as required
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -