1 - 10 of 945 (0.75 seconds)
Supreme Court of India
Shankar Ramchandra Abhyankar vs Krishnaji Dattatreya Bapat on 16 April, 1969 Equivalent citations
Supreme Court of India
India
New Standard Engineering Co. Ltd vs N. L. Abhyankar And Ors on 2 February, 1978 Equivalent citations ... STANDARD ENGINEERING CO. LTD.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
N. L. ABHYANKAR AND ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT02/02/1978
BENCH:
SHINGAL
Supreme Court of India
Bombay High Court
Jagdish Balwantrao Abhyankar And ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Others on 28 April, 1993 Equivalent citations
Bombay High Court
thus come before me for final disposal.
5. Mr. Abhyankar, who appears for the petitioner, contends that the
learned Judge ... Rent
Act. Lastly Mr. Abhyankar submitted that the learned Judge has
committed an error of law in declaring both
Bombay High Court
Supreme Court of India
N.L. Abhyankar And Others Etc vs Union Of India on 24 April, 1984 Equivalent citations ... Bench: Reddy, O Chinnappa
PETITIONER:
N.L. ABHYANKAR AND OTHERS ETC.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
UNION OF INDIA
DATE OF JUDGMENT
Supreme Court of India
High Court
Krishnaji Dattatraya Bapat vs Dr. Shankar Ramchandra Abhyankar on 14 June, 1965 Equivalent citations: (1965) 67 BOMLR
Bombay High Court
decisions, no doubt, support the contentions raised.
12. Mr. Abhyankar, Special Government Pleader, for respondent No. 1, on
the other ... Article
31(5)(b)(i). In the alternative, Mr. Abhyankar contends that even if
the provisions of Article
Bombay High Court
notice of the kind which was served here. Shri Abhyankar, who appears
for the petitioner, says in the first place ... accept the interpretation
sought to be placed by Shri Abhyankar the position would be that sin
electrical undertaking will
Bombay High Court
Bombay High Court
N.L. Abhyankar vs Union Of India And Ors. on 16 December, 1994 Equivalent citations
Bombay High Court
applications. These revision
applications were heard by Mr. Justice Abhyankar, who held that the
necessary powers were not delegated ... therefore, illegal. In view of these findings, Mr.
Justice Abhyankar held that the Corporation was not entitled to recover
Bombay High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -