1 - 10 of 3208 (1.15 seconds)
account for his possession;
(b) that an accomplice is unworthy of credit, unless he is corroborated in material particulars
Central Government Act
handwriting, purporting to be addressed to an accomplice in such criminal conspiracy, and puts the letter in a place which
Central Government Act
woman who has been raped is not an accomplice,
her evidence has been treated by the Courts on somewhat
similar ... admissibility of the uneorrobo-
rated evidence of an accomplice is the law in India also so
far as accomplices
Supreme Court of India
Criminal Procedure, 1973
306. Tender of pardon to accomplice.
(1) With a view to obtaining the evidence of any person
Central Government Act
Court may presume that (b) an accomplice is
unworthy of credit, unless he is corroborated in material particulars.
This ... rule of practice regarding the credibility of an accomplice is
based on human experience and the court will look
Law Commission Report
deal with the law relating to evidence of an
accomplice. An accomplice namely a guilty associate in
crime ... conviction based on the uncorroborated testimony of an
accomplice is not illegal, but the rule of guidance
indicated in Illustration
Supreme Court of India
Confession
of co-accused--Evidentiary value--Evidence of
accomplice--Necessity of corroboration--Confession--Practice
of examining magistrate who recorded ... based on the uncorroborated testimo-
ny of an accomplice provided the judge has the rule of
caution, which experience dictates
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
Suresh Chandra Bahri vs State Of Bihar on 13 July, 1994
Supreme Court of India
conviction of an accused
on the testimony of an accomplice could not be said to be
illegal, the courts will ... Evidence Act which reads-
:-
s. 133 "An accomplice shall be a competent
witness against an accused person
Supreme Court of India
followed.
(ii) The distinction between evidence of an accomplice under
s. 133 and confession tinder s. 33 Evidence ... been committed by his
four employees and their accomplices, the two appellants
before us. On the 26th March
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -