1 - 10 of 7519 (1.63 seconds)
Indian Evidence Act, 1872
31. Admissions not conclusive proof, but may estop.- Admissions are not conclusive proof of the matters
Central Government Act
Evidence Act, albeit such admissions are not tantamount to conclusive proof of
the matters admitted.
32. In Jeeth Kaur ... Evidence Act cautions that the admissions are not conclusive proof of the
matters but they may operate as estoppel
Andhra High Court
Madras High Court
Sri Nallalagu Polytechnic ... vs D. Sivakumar on 23 February, 2000 Equivalent citations
Madras High Court
Bombay High Court
Narayan Ganesh Dastane vs Sucheta Narayan Dastane on 24 February, 1969 Equivalent
Bombay High Court
Indian Evidence Act is:-
"31. Admissions are not conclusive proof of the matters admitted,
but they may operate as estoppels ... urged
that the admission constituted conclusive proof.
As I have observed earlier, the admissions in the application
Delhi High Court
Delhi High Court
Delhi Lotteries vs Rajesh Aggarwal And Others on 20 October, 1997 Equivalent
Delhi High Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Chetak Constructions Limited vs Om Prakash And Ors. on 25 July
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Telecom Disputes Settlement Tribunal
M/S. Bala Cable Network, ... vs Channel Plus-Tn, Chennai on
Telecom Disputes Settlement Tribunal
trial may dispense with
proof of a particular fact. Section 58 deals with admissions during
trial ... judicial
admissions or stipulations dispense it with proof. Admissions are not
conclusive proof but may operate as estoppel against
Supreme Court of India
held thus:
" The law by no means regards admissions as conclusive proof of the
matters admitted. This is because ... other hand
evidentiary admissions which are receivable at the trial as evidence
are by themselves not conclusive. They
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -