Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 3640 (1.58 seconds)

Hanumayya, AIR 1959 SC 57, where a bench of three Judges of the Supreme Court while dealing with the scope ... 1959 SC 57, was also approvingly quoted by Venkatarama Ayyar J. In my opinion, the Supreme Court in the recent
Punjab-Haryana High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 1 -
AIR 1960 P H 575
- Dua
Pattabhiramaswamy v. S. Hanumayya (AIR 1959 SC 57), Paras Nath v. Mohani Dasi (AIR 1959 SC 1204), Deokinandan v. Murlidhar ... observed as follows:-- "In Pattabhiramaswamy v. S. Hanumayya, AIR 1959 SC 57 this Court held that finding of fact arrived
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 28 - Cited by 1 -
AIR 1977 All 286
- M Mehrotra
Deity Pattabhiramaswamy v. S. Hanymayya and Others [AIR 1959 SC 57], the High Court of Madras set aside the findings
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 21 - Cited by 70
Pattabhiramaswamy v. Hanumayya, AIR 1959 SC 57, Raruha Singh v. Achal Singh, AIR 1961 SC 1097; Mst. Kharbuja Kuer
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 7 - Cited by 48 -
1981 AIR 707
made to Deity Pattabhiramaswamy v. S. Hanyamayya AIR 1959 SC 57, where the admission of second, appeal was reproached ... gambling in litigation. 17. Even in recent times the Supreme Court in Bholaram v. Ameerchand, , has held in the context
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 53 - Cited by 8 -
AIR 1993 Cal 144
- A K Sengupta
Deity Pattabhiramaswamy v. S. Hanymayya and Others [AIR 1959 SC 57], the High Court of Madras set aside the findings
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 29 - Cited by 6 - D Bhandari
Court in the cases of Pittaabhiramaswamy v. Hanymayya, AIR 1959 SC 57 and Rarubha Singh v. Achal Singh
Patna High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 6 -
2003 (2) BLJR 1260
- S Katriar
1959 SC 57. In the last mentioned case it has been undoubtedly held by their Lordships of the Supreme Court ... Committee in Midnapur Zamindari Co. Ltd. v. Uma Charan, AIR 1923 PC 187: "If the question to be decided
Punjab-Haryana High Court
- Cites 5 - Cited by 6
supreme Court in D. Pattabhiramaswamy v. S. Hanyamayya, AIR 1959 SC 57 and Bithal Dass Khanna v. Hafiz Abdul
Punjab-Haryana High Court
- Cites 3 - Cited by 6 -
AIR 1979 P H 12
Section 57 of the Central Provinces Municipalities Act and in Radheshyam's case, AIR 1959 SC 107, Kapur, J. observed ... quasi-judicial approach was intended in Section 57: AIR 1959 SC 107 at p. 127. That again is, however
Madhya Pradesh High Court
- Cites 20 - Cited by 5 -
AIR 1970 MP 154
- Singh
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next