Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 229 (0.55 seconds)

Supreme Court of India Amritdhara Pharmacy vs Satyadeo Gupta on 27 April, 1962 Equivalent citations: 1963 AIR 449 Bench ... PETITIONER: AMRITDHARA PHARMACY Vs. RESPONDENT: SATYADEO GUPTA DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/04/1962 BENCH: DAS, S.K. BENCH
Supreme Court of India
- Cites 10 - Cited by 139 -
1963 AIR 449
Allahabad High Court Dr. Baldeo Sharma And Anr. vs Amritdhara Pharmacy (P.) Ltd. And ... on 13 February, 1974 Equivalent citations ... Companies Act. 2. The petition related to the Amritdhara Pharmacy Private Ltd. This company is essentially a family concern, nine
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 3 - Cited by 0 -
1975 45 CompCas 268 All
- S Chandra
been filed by the Amritdhara Pharmacy against Shri Satya Deo Gupta. The relevant facts, which have given rise to these ... journal and an opposition was put in by the Amritdhara Pharmacy. The case of the opposition was that
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 8 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 1958 All 823
- B Dayal
Allahabad High Court Tula Ram Ram Rakshpal vs Amritdhara Pharmacy Ltd., Dehra ... on 13 November, 1953 Equivalent citations
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 3 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 1954 All 720
particular goods with that trade mark?" (20) In Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta, , the question was whether the trade ... confusien to trade in view of the trade name "Amritdhara" which had already been registered, as a trade name
Delhi High Court
- Cites 15 - Cited by 10 -
ILR 1973 Delhi 393
- T Tarchari
authorities are given below. 30. The first decision is Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo . In this decision it is held ... court. As pointed out by the Apex Court in Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo , the Act does not lay down
Madras High Court
- Cites 26 - Cited by 8 -
(1998) 3 MLJ 214
- M Karpagavinayagam
that impression is not due to imperfect recollection (See Amritdhara Pharmacy Vs. Staya Deo Gupta, ). There is distinction between causing ... thing - the whole words has to be considered. (See Amritdhara Pharmacy vs. Staya Deo Gupta, ). It is not right
Delhi High Court
- Cites 15 - Cited by 1 -
1997 IVAD Delhi 542
- S Kapoor
that impression is not due to imperfect recollection (See Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta, ). There is distinction between causing ... thing - the whole word leas to be considered, (See Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo Gupta, (supra). It is not right
Delhi High Court
- Cites 20 - Cited by 0 -
1997 IIIAD Delhi 220
- S Kapoor
contrary to the decision of the Apex Court in Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo, , wherein it was held that ... referring to the decisions of the Apex Court in Amritdhara Pharmacy v. Satya Deo (supra) and Chinna Krishna Chettiar
Bombay High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 0 -
2003 (1) BomCR 642
- R Khandeparkar
Delhi High Court N. Ranga Rao And Sons vs Anil Garg And Ors. on 2
Delhi High Court
- Cites 26 - Cited by 0 -
128 (2006) DLT 649
- S K Kaul
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next