1 - 10 of 5748 (0.94 seconds)
competent
authority under Rule 13 of the Army Rules 1954.
4. The learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition inter ... against the appellant
contrary to Rule 12 of the Army Rules, 1954 [hereinafter
referred to as the Army Rules
Supreme Court of India
Central Government while deciding appeal
under s. 165-Army Rules, 1954, ss. 50(2) and 121(4)-When
attracted.
HEADNOTE ... Inquiry under the
provisions of Ch. VI of the Army Rules was ordered by the
Commander for the area. After
Supreme Court of India
Army Rules.
1954, r. 14-Whether r. 14, ultra vires.
HEADNOTE:
The respondent, a commissioned officer in the Indian Army ... after following the procedure under r. 14 of the Army Rules,
1954.
On the question whether r. 14, which gives
Supreme Court of India
along the international border with Pakistan. In
accordance with Army Rules, 1954 framed under Section 191 of
the Act "staff ... proceedings in the court of inquiry in
accordance with Army Rule 180 and for submitting anything in
his defence
Supreme Court of India
Army Rules 1954 Rules 14 and 68 to 71,
scope of-Competency of the Chief of the Army Staff ... have
recourse to Rule 14 of the Army Rules, when the general
court martial originally and on revision returned
Supreme Court of India
applying provisions of Army
Act, 1950 and Army Rules 1954 to members of GREF in exercise
of power under ... Rules, 1965 as also provisions of Army Act and Army Rules to
members of GREF violative
Supreme Court of India
Rules 39, 40 and 102 of
the Army Rules. Appearing for the respondent No.1 Mr.Ranjit
Kumar, Advocate ... read with Rules
40 and 102 of the Army Rules leave no doubt that the
Judge-Advocate appointed
Supreme Court of India
also alleged violation of Rule 22 of the Army Rules; denial of his
right to be represented by a Defending ... contrary to the mandate
of Rule 71 of the Army Rules; the defect in the signing of the warrant
Supreme Court of India
ground of non
complying of the provision of Army Rules which are mandatory in nature.
These provisions, according ... violation of the
rule 22 of the Army Rules.
(7) The prosecution has cited as many as 16 witnesses
Delhi High Court
service on his own
request as laid down in Army Rule 13(3) Item III(ii). The petitioner ... volunteered, such discharge was not
permissible under Army Rule 13(3) Item III(ii). As per para
Allahabad High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -