1 - 10 of 908 (1.01 seconds)
Army Rules.
1954, r. 14-Whether r. 14, ultra vires.
HEADNOTE:
The respondent, a commissioned officer in the Indian Army ... following the procedure under r. 14 of the Army Rules,
1954.
On the question whether r. 14, which gives power
Supreme Court of India
applying provisions of Army
Act, 1950 and Army Rules 1954 to members of GREF in exercise
of power under ... read with Chapter IV of the
Army Rules 1954 is within the scope and ambit of Article
Supreme Court of India
ITEM OF TABLE IN RULE 17 OF ARMY RULES 1954
READ WITH ARMY ACT SECTION 20(3) OF ARMY ... sanctioned in accordance with Army Rule 17
of Army Rules 1954 read with Army Act Section 20(3) of Army
Delhi High Court
Martial. Therefore under rule 40(2) of the Army Rules, 1954 will
be applicable in the present case disqualifying such ... initio.
21. Under Rule 102 of the Army Rules, 1954 an officer who is
disqualified for sitting on a Court
Calcutta High Court
Delhi), Rule
14 of the Army Rules, 1954, which is in pari materia with Rule 18, was
challenged as being ... that the
power under Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954 was not independent and it
was subject to Section
Delhi High Court
read with Rule 13 of the Army Rules, 1954
(hereinafter referred to as the Rules of 1954).
(x) Though ... Section 20 of the Army Act, 1950 and Rule 17 of the Rules of 1954 have
no application
Rajasthan High Court
Army Rules 1954 Rules 14 and 68 to 71,
scope of-Competency of the Chief of the Army Staff ... Army Staff under Rule 14
of the Army Rules 1954 issued the impugned show cause notice
dated November
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court of India
Union Of India & Anr vs Charanjit S. Gill & Ors
Supreme Court of India
SCALE (1)313
ACT:
Army Act, 1950/Army Rules, 1954: Sections 39(a), 71(e),
108 and 116/Rule ... court martial that Rule 39(2) of the Army Rules 1954 is
applicable and the Commanding Officer is not competent
Supreme Court of India
there was violation of Rule 37 of
the Army Rules , 1954. The respondent had alleged in the writ petition
that ... satisfy the requirements of Rule 37 of the Army Rules, 1954.
In the writ petition, it was contended
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -