Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 4428 (0.34 seconds)

Central Government Act Article 311(2)(b) in The Constitution Of India 1949 (b) where the authority empowered to dismiss
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 117
Central Government Act Article 311(1) in The Constitution Of India 1949 (1) No person who is a member
Central Government Act
- Cites 0 - Cited by 334
Dhingra Vs. Union of India (UOI), the Apex Court pointed out that the protection under Article ... Union of India), (1994) 2 SCC 323 (M.Venugopal Vs. Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India
Madras High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 1
cadre, appointment, promotions etc. 4. The Union of India which was the defendant in the suit filed a written statement ... case of Kapoor Singh Harnam Singh v. Union of India, , related to a case of a Supervisor in the Military
Delhi High Court
- Cites 27 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 1969 Delhi 220
attract the provisions of Article 311 of the Constitution of India? 3. Whether the new Rule ... case of P. L. Dhingra v. Union of India, AIR 1958 SC 36 at pp. 47-48 observed as follows
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 21 - Cited by 4 -
AIR 1959 All 169
- J Sahai
Delhi High Court Brigadiar Bhupinder Singh vs Union Of India And Ors. on 18 December
Delhi High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 1 -
ILR 1975 Delhi 546
- H Anand
interpreted by the Constitution Bench of the Apex Court in the case of Union of India v. Tulsiram Patel ... referred to the case of Arjun Chaubey v. Union of India where the order was interfered with on the ground
Patna High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 1 -
2001 (2) BLJR 1322
- N Rai
holds a Civil Post under Article 311, Constitution of India and the fact that Home Guard was paid 'honorarium' made ... consequently, protection of Article 311 cannot be taken resort to Article 311 of the Constitution of India to treat
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 27 - Cited by 0 -
2003 (4) AWC 3046
- A Yog
these questions of fact. In the case of Union of India v. T. R. Varma ... case of Parshotam Lal Dhingra v. Union of India, AIR 1958 SC 36; ''But the mere fact that the servant
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 43 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 1959 All 643
- J Sahai
view has been settled by Constitution Bench in Historical case of Union of India and Anr. v. Tulsi Ram Patel ... Then came the decision in Nelson Motis v. Union of India (1992)4 SCC 711:1992 Supp (1)SCR 325AIR1992
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 47 - Cited by 0 -
2005 (2) ESC 1158
- S Yadav
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next