Mobile View
Advanced Search Search Tips
Order results by
Relevance
Document Types
All
1 - 10 of 5902 (0.99 seconds)

entitled to reckon limitation from the date of their auction purchase,---first, because they were not purchasers of the putni ... entitled to reckon limitation from the date of their auction purchase, either under article 121 of the second schedule
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 6 - Cited by 12 -
(1898) ILR 25 Cal 167
- Banerjee
rights alleged to have been acquired by the auction purchase of 1907, held that Section 66 applied to the case ... plaintiff's case was rested by him upon the auction purchase:-- There was, however, no case put forward
Bombay High Court
- Cites 6 - Cited by 7 -
(1941) 43 BOMLR 138
- G Rankin
title to the one kurni under the court auction purchase the former proceedings were a bar to their claiming possession ... parte and his title under the court auction purchase was paramount and outside the controversy in that suit. The question
Madras High Court
- Cites 2 - Cited by 5 -
AIR 1967 Mad 453
borne in mind that in the event of an auction-purchase made by the decree-holder himself being set aside ... against the judgment-debtor, to say that, notwithstanding the auction-purchase made by him, his decree for the full amount
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 13 - Cited by 5 -
AIR 1933 All 218
- I Ahmad
Courts below therefore, is that by the auction-purchase the plaintiff has acquired no interest whatsoever and his suit ... whether the plaintiff acquired any rights by his auction-purchase, it is necessary for us to examine that point first
Allahabad High Court
- Cites 11 - Cited by 4 -
AIR 1925 All 580
- Sulaiman
party). It will further appear that prior to the auction purchase by the plaintiffs, defendants ... plaintiffs acquired no title to the same by the auction purchase. Their title, however, to the eastern half was valid
Patna High Court
- Cites 13 - Cited by 3 -
AIR 1960 Pat 474
- K Singh
possession ever since the date of his auction purchase on 22-6-1937. Upon these findings the learned Munsif dismissed ... arise. It is quite clear that there the auction purchase was by the landlord himself and the landlord after
Calcutta High Court
- Cites 17 - Cited by 2 -
AIR 1961 Cal 75
- Lahiri
suit property on the ground that the auction purchase was made by the first defendant on behalf of the plaintiff ... suit based on an agreement subsequent to a court auction purchase to convey the property purchased to the plaintiff will
Madras High Court
- Cites 13 - Cited by 2 -
AIR 1951 Mad 943
- Rajamannar
Issue No. 27, on the question of the auction-purchase, which was decided in the auction-purchasers' favour on September ... defendant No. 1 denied the auction-purchase and set up his adverse possession, and so adverse possession will run from
Bombay High Court
- Cites 14 - Cited by 2 -
153 Ind Cas 637
- Baker
Legislature, by this explanation did not constitute the auction purchase as the representative of the judgment-debtor. On the other ... under the judgment-debtor. It is true that the auction purchase gets the right, title and interest of the judgment
Bombay High Court
- Cites 11 - Cited by 1 -
AIR 1967 Bom 34
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next