1 - 10 of 858 (0.79 seconds)
Land Reforms Act, 1951
which provides that 'a Bhumidhar shall, subject to the provisions of
the Act, have the right ... land in
respect of which he is a bhumidhar and to use it for any purposes
whatsoever'.
It is contended
Allahabad High Court
Abolition Act to this area, the
petitioner became a bhumidhar of the land under ... further prays that he may be declared a
bhumidhar or in the alternative a sirdar under the
provisions
Supreme Court of India
Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1951: s.
169-Bequest-Bhumidhar vesting life estate in wife and
remainder in their daughters ... beguest-
Tesrator's personal law-Whether attracted.
HEADNOTE:
The Bhumidhar bequeathed life estate to his wife and the
remainder
Supreme Court of India
open to the Appellant to contend that Bhumidhars had no right in the minor
mineral China Clay. Distinguishing the judgment ... counsel would submit that the Respondents therein were
not Bhumidhars and, thus, the said decision must be held to have
Supreme Court of India
land forms part of the holding of a
bhumidhar, sirdar or asami without the consent of such
bhumidhar, sirdar ... does not form part of the holding
of a bhumidhar, sirdar or asami without the consent of the
Gaon Sabha
Supreme Court of India
respondents purchased the land in dispute from the
bhumidhars thereof, but 'P' (predecessor-in-interest of the
appellants) claimed ... Tota Ram and Lajja Ram were declared to be
bhumidhars in respect of that land and a Sanad was issued
Supreme Court of India
joint family could be deemed
to be one single bhumidhar. and no transfer could be made unless ... than one member of the
joint family become co-bhumidhars of a joint holding the joint family
as such does
Allahabad High Court
declaration that he had acquired the rights of
a Bhumidhar mentioned in section 137 of the Act in respect
Supreme Court of India
petitioners is that Respondent 3 Prem
Nath is a Bhumidhar and the petitioners are his tenants and
by virtue ... provisions of the Act they have become
Bhumidhars and Respondent 3 cannot seek eviction or any
other relief under
Supreme Court of India
against the other co-bhumidhars - Prem
Prakash and Dev Raj by impleading then as defendants-1 and 2
respectively ... holding by adverse
possession as against the other co-bhumidhars and,
therefore, question of title was involved in the suit
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -