1 - 10 of 6208 (1.63 seconds)
that the present plaintiff is not a bona fide
purchaser without notice and for valuable consideration and the defendants ... purchasers
raised the plea that they were bona fide purchasers without notice as the sale
deed in their favour
Madras High Court
defendant is not a bona fide purchaser for value without notice and
that he had notice of the agreement ... that the 2nd defendant is not a bona fide purchaser
without notice. He concurred with the opinion of the trial
Andhra High Court
urged that he is a bona fide, purchaser for value without notice
and is entitled to retain the property, even ... cases where the purchaser is a, bona fide
purchaser for value without notice of the irregularity or the fraud
Calcutta High Court
defendant No. 2 was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice. The
suit was, accordingly, dismissed.
The Lower Appellate ... defendant No. 2 was not a bona fide purchaser for value without notice.
The Lower Appellate Court, therefore, concluded that
Allahabad High Court
conclusion that the defendant was a bona fide purchaser for
value without notice of this property from Martand and dismissed ... that the defendant not being a bona fide
purchaser for value without notice, was not protected under Section 64,
Trusts
Bombay High Court
that
defendant no.2 was a bona fide purchaser for value without
notice and hence specific performance could ... showing that he
was a bona fide purchaser for value without notice and that
burden was not legally discharged
Supreme Court of India
third defendant is not a bona fide purchaser for value without
notice of the prior agreement. The plaintiff also protested ... that the third defendant is not
a bona fide purchaser without notice. In the light of the said findings
Madras High Court
Bombay High Court
Dhruv N. Shah vs Dy. Cit on 30 May, 2003 Equivalent citations
Bombay High Court
therefore the Fund was not a bona fide purchaser without
notice. It is a fit case wherein corporate veil ... Fund that it is a bona fide
purchaser without notice cannot be accepted. Can Fina is a wholly owned
subsidiary
Company Law Board
incorrect boundaries that he is a bona fide
purchaser for value without notice. The appellant has to blame himself ... raised a plea that they were bona fide
purchasers for value without notice of the suit mortgage as regards
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -