Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
Courts
chennai
81 - 90 of 2150 (0.55 seconds)

Town, Chennai-600 003. ..Petitioners Versus 1. The Central Administrative Tribunal Chennai Bench, rep. by its Registrar, Chennai ... Writ Petition is to the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal dated 3-8-1998 made
Madras High Court
- Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
Petitioner Vs. 1. R. Rangarajan 2. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, High Court Buildings, Chennai 600 104. .. Respondents ... expenses / benefit of medical facilities. For convenience, the Central Administrative Tribunal, which decided various applications in favour of the retired
Madras High Court
- Cites 15 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
praying for quashing of the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench dated ... order dated 07.01.2005 which was challenged before the Central Administrative Tribunal. 4. The first respondent has thus completed more than
Madras High Court
- Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
petitioners had filed an original application before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai ... Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai, had passed an order holding that the employer-employee relationship existed and therefore, the matter
Madras High Court
- Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
Narayanan ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The Central Administrative Tribunal ( Madras Bench )rep. by its Registrar High Court Buildings, Chennai ... writ petitioner was the applicant before the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.59 of 1996 challenging the order
Madras High Court
- Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
Chairman, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi-1. 2.The Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, rep.by its Registrar, Chennai-104. ... Respondents ... Railway, Park Town, Chennai-600003. 3. The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai. ... Respondents
Madras High Court
- Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document
petitioner management was covered by the Central Administrative Tribunal, the workman ought to have filed an application before the Central ... Government bringing the Institution within the purview of Central Administrative Tribunal, whether the jurisdiction of the Labour Court is ousted
Madras High Court
- Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
declined. He challenged the same before the Central Administrative Tribunal and after adjudicating the dispute, the Tribunal held that ... grounds. When the rejection order was challenged, the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissed the case. On appeal, the Supreme Court, going
Madras High Court
- Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
service" could only be agitated before the Central and State Administrative Tribunals, set up specifically under the Act. The decisions ... decision before the Supreme Court was, whether the Central Administrative Tribunal is vested with the jurisdiction to entertain and decide
Madras High Court
- Cites 33 - Cited by 0 -
(1995) 1 MLJ 1
- A Lakshmanan - Full Document
such 'disputes' could only be agitated before the Central Administrative Tribunal, set up under the Act. This contention was negatived ... under which the Act was passed and the Central Administrative Tribunal established. 4. After the coming into force
Madras High Court
- Cites 17 - Cited by 0 -
(1991) IILLJ 92 Mad
- A Anand - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
Previous  
5
6
7
8
9  
10
11
12
13
14
Next