1 - 10 of 30214 (2.10 seconds)
Section 23 in The Limitation Act, 1963
23. Suits for compensation for acts not actionable without special damage ... case of a suit for compensation for an act which does not give rise to a cause of action unless
Central Government Act
Amending Act No. 39 of 1961, a suit for compensation for loss,
destruction, damage, deterioration or non-delivery of goods ... while on the railway of another administration, a suit for
compensation for loss of the life of, or personal injury
Madras High Court
Indian Railways Act is as follows : --
"A suit for compensation for loss of the life of, or personal injury ... does not
expressly provide that in respect of suits for compensation for loss,
destruction, damage, deterioration, nondelivery, etc. of passenger
Calcutta High Court
choice
of forum for filing suits for compensation for loss, de-
struction, damage, deterioration or non-delivery of goods ... provision. The old Section
reads:
"Section 80: suit for compensation for injury
to through booked traffic:
444
Notwithstanding anything
Supreme Court of India
provides the
period of limitation for a suit "for compensation for the breach of any
contract, express or implied ... ceases. The present suit is, prima facie,
a suit for compensation for the breach of the contract committed
Supreme Court of India
suit for an account a suit for compensation in that sense? It has been
decided in some cases that ... suit for compensation in that sense.
That is the effect of Matt Lal Bose v. Amin Chand Chattopadhay
Madras High Court
caused," It is a simple suit for recovery of the statutory
compensation, payable under Clause 4 of Rule ... case of
recovery of statutory compensation at all. The suits there were purely
actions for damages. The act which caused
Calcutta High Court
that the above section is applicable only to suits for
compensation and damages; and also that a suit ... illegally collected is not a suit for compensation or damages
and does not require notice under the section. Although this
Madras High Court
plaintiff Company and refuses to pay any
such compensation. In Suit No. 73 of 1930, which has given rise ... respect of any alleged tort, they are
suits to recover statutory compensation and the Government having
admittedly refused to take
Patna High Court
section inasmuch as the section
contemplates only suits for compensation and damages, and (2) that even
if notice is required ... petitioner that this section
contemplates only suits for compensation and for damages against the
Local Board and as the petitioner
Madras High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -