1 - 10 of 3313 (1.14 seconds)
offending vehicle. This is a
clear case of contributory negligence. That being so, the awarded amount
cannot be maintained ... plea which was stressed strenuously related to alleged
contributory negligence. Though there is no statutory definition, in
common parlance 'negligence
Supreme Court of India
However, the High Court held that there was contributory
negligence on the part of the appellant to the extent ... High Court
was justified in holding that there was contributory negligence on the part of the
appellant. The Tribunal found
Supreme Court of India
view of the finding that he was guilty of
contributory negligence on his part, found to be entitled ... appellant can be said to have guilty of contributory negligence.
Ordinarily, the doctrine of contributory negligence is not applicable
Supreme Court of India
liability. It was necessary for the claimants to
prove negligence of the other side and while so proving it again ... remained open for the tort-feeasors to bring any contributory
negligence by way of defence. Simple application which was intended
Gujarat High Court
composite will have to be decided. The
topic of contributory negligence has been dealt with by Charlesworth
and Percy ... have
said on page 3-02 as :
"The expression 'contributory negligence' is too firmly established
to be disregarded, but unless
Karnataka High Court
submission that the pedestrian also would be guilty of contributory
negligence. We are inclined to accept this submission ... Ratan may be negligent to certain extent, her
contributory negligence cannot. be more than 25%. and 76% of negligence
would
Gujarat High Court
crossed each other. The
appellant was not guilty of contributory negligence by merely placing
his hand on the window sill ... received by him.
Since the appellant was guilty of contributory negligence he was not
entitled to any damages
Allahabad High Court
accident is caused due to the
carelessness and contributory negligence of the deceased and
opponent No. 7 That the opponent ... their record that the accident was due to the contributory
negligence of the deceased and opponent No. 7 as well
Gujarat High Court
ground that there was
contributory negligence on the part of the driver of the Car, who lost his life ... memo that the Tribunal itself had not
held any contributory negligence on the part of Maruti
Supreme Court of India
grounds of quantum and alleged
contributory negligence of the other vehicle which collided with the
vehicle in which the deceased ... Company should be allowed to urge that there was contributory
negligence on that part of the driver of the other
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -