1 - 10 of 2140 (1.42 seconds)
refusing to permit the appellants to pay the deficit court
fees and to enhance the compensation ... application in August 1989 for
permission to pay deficit court fee. That application was
directed to be posted along with
Supreme Court of India
Supreme Court while pointing out
the scope of Section 149, ruled thus,
"Therefore, the Court is required ... laid
down by the Supreme Court is nothing but failure on the part of the Court
concerned to apply
Madras High Court
competent to extend the time for payment of Court Fees,
deficit Court Fees has been paid, thereby, taking back ... basis of the permission
granted by the Court, deficit Court Fees has been paid, thereby,
bringing the suit within
Madras High Court
trial judge did not entertain the said plea, the High Court
should not have interfered therewith.
9. The respondents ... made
before the time fixed by the High Court for
payment of deficit court fee had actually run out.
That
Supreme Court of India
appeal preferred to the High Court was dismissed for non-payment of
deficit court-fee. The order of dismissal ... Court-fee on the
memorandum of appeal filed in the High Court had been paid, but the
deficit court
Patna High Court
passed on 3.5.2002 namely on the date of deficit court fee, but only on 22.1.2004 the delay has been condoned ... fortified in the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme court in Velamuri Venkata Sivaprasad Vs. Kothuri Venkateshwaralu and others, reported
Madras High Court
plaintiff should be granted time for payment of deficit Court fee.
However, before it was placed before the Presiding Officer ... time for payment of deficit Court
fee. As on that date deficit Court fee had already been paid, the Court
Karnataka High Court
shall mutatis
mutandis apply to appeals preferred to the High Court under Section
110D. Therefore, there is not only ... Rule 292, it is clear that the
additional court fee would have to be paid over the initial amount
which
Gujarat High Court
granting three weeks' time for the
payment of deficit court fees. The plaintiff, after affixing the
court fee, represented ... submitted
that the plaint was presented with the deficit court fee and the
same was returned, granting three weeks' time
Madras High Court
deficit court fee and the High Court, therefore, was not right in
refusing to accept the deficit court ... fee as their
appeals were pending in the High Court. We do not agree with the
contention. This court
Supreme Court of India
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -