1 - 10 of 13470 (1.16 seconds)
employment--Scope
of employment--If driver gives a lift without charging
anything--If master liable--Vicarious liability--Master and
servant ... driver of the vehicle. It also
found that the first respondent, the owner of the company,
is liable
Supreme Court of India
dissenting) : The owner was liable.
528
A was not a mere driver of the vehicle but was the owner ... defendant as a car-driver and that, therefore, he would be
liable in damages for the accident caused
Supreme Court of India
that the owner is not only liable for
the negligence of the driver if that driver is his servant acting ... company could not be held vicariously liable for the act of
their driver in taking Purshottam as a passenger
Supreme Court of India
owner of the car was vicariously liable for the tort committed by the
driver. The Bench of the Andhra Pradesh ... business, the master is not liable for the tort committed by
the driver with reference to the passengers carried unauthorisedly
Madras High Court
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
and the driver of the vehicle arc liable. The Tribunal has held that
both were ... question is whether respondent No. 1 driver is liable.
After the accident the first information report was lodged. This
Delhi High Court
Singh and the truck driver Bhagwandas, (the
appellants in these three appeals) were made liable, jointly and
severally ... injuries to claimant Ram
Prasad.
24. The truck driver is, therefore, liable to pay compensation.
Appellant No. 2 Saheb Singh
Madhya Pradesh High Court
first consider whether the insurer is liable when the driver
was found to be possessing fake driving licence and whether ... Insurer submits that the
Driver had no Licence and therefore the Insurer cannot be made liable.
He also submits that
Andhra High Court
result, the Tribunal held the
insurance company and the driver liable to pay compensation ... master, i.e., the owner, is liable for the act of the driver. Since we
have taken the view
Bombay High Court
that the master is not only liable for the
negligence of the driver if that driver is his servant acting ... that the
owner is not only liable for the negligence of the driver if that
driver is his servant acting
Madras High Court
This is not correct.
The owner is also liable if the driver is, with the owner's consent,
driving ... consequently the master, in such cases, is liable if
the driver was guilty of initial negligence
Punjab-Haryana High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -