1 - 10 of 123638 (4.35 seconds)
order
dated 23rd July,1997 closed prosecution's pre-charge evidence as she
found that neither any evidence was produced ... name was tendered. The order of closure of pre-charge evidence was
challenged by the Customs Department
Delhi High Court
petitioner appeared before
the learned Magistrate on 27.1.84. Evidence before charge have not been
completed within four years from that ... Amendment), Act, 1988 came into force all the evidence before charge
had been concluded on 7th February, 1989 and, therefore
Calcutta High Court
were cited by the prosecution but during the pre-charge evidence during
the past 15 years only two of them ... prosecution sought for
adjournment to produce the pre-charge evidence. The petitioner, as
such, has been denied speedy trial violating
Delhi High Court
Court and the matter
was pending for pre- charge evidence on 29-11-1986. On that date, the
complainant ... accused before the second complaint was
fixed for pre-charge evidence.
9. The Sessions Court in passing the impugned order
Madhya Pradesh High Court
official duty, without first recording the
pre-charge evidence, as envisaged under Section 244 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure ... Section 23 of the Act, without recording any
pre-charge evidence, as envisaged under Section 244 of the Code
Punjab-Haryana High Court
court and
admitted to bail.
7. In the pre-charge evidence the applicant-complainant,
Ramesh Kumar, appeared ... Godara
as CW-1 and closed his pre-charge evidence by tendering into
evidence a copy of the Kalendra
Punjab-Haryana High Court
proceed
in terms of Section 244 CrPC. The pre-charge evidence in the form of
the statements of the Respondent ... statements were
recorded as well.
8. In her pre-charge evidence Respondent No. 1 was unable to name any
single
Delhi High Court
motbir Devi Lal on 22-1-87 as
pre-charge evidence. On 12-3-1987, it was reported that ... merits he has clearly conceded that from
the pre-charge evidence recorded in this case there is no sufficient
material
Rajasthan High Court
before the
learned Magistrate who was recording the pre-charge
evidence on a day-to-day basis and made time ... with the matter to proceed with recording of pre-charge
evidence on a day-to-day basis and complete
Delhi High Court
application the CMM fixed the
case for recording pre-charge evidence on 22.03.2004.
That thereafter, from time to time ... case was adjourned
for recording pre-charge evidence.
x) When prosecution obtained summons against its witnesses
and on certain occasions
Delhi High Court
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -