Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
1 - 10 of 685 (0.32 seconds)

Rule 31 of CPC. (B) KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SERVANTS (FAMILY PENSION) RULES, 1964--Who are entitled to the benefit under these ... rules? The Family Pension Scheme is in the nature of a Welfare scheme framed by the Government to provide relief
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 6 - Cited by 1 - Padmaraj - Full Document
late Ramaswamy nominated the plaintiffs for purposes of his family pension and other benefits and despite all this, defendants ... finding given by the lower Court with reference to Family Pension allowable to the members of the family of deceased
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 18 - Cited by 0 -
II (1993) DMC 133
- N Bhat - Full Document
Bench of this Court for consideration:- (1) Whether the family pension is liable to be deducted out of the compensation ... month. Due to his death, his wife is getting family pension of Rs. 440/- per month. The Tribunal held relying
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 17 - Cited by 0 -
I (1998) ACC 689
- R Raveendran - Full Document
direction to the respondent to grant the family pension under Swathantratha Sainik Samman Pension Scheme to her treating ... said late Venkanna Hamanna Nayak applied for grant of family pension under the Scheme both to State and Central Governments
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 5 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 2003 Kant 54
- P V Shetty - Full Document
first respondent, for grant of family pension under the CCS Pension Rules ('Rules' or 'Pensiori Rules' for short). The said ... praying for grant of family pension by taking into account, the continuous service of 19 years rendered by her husband
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 6 - Cited by 0 -
ILR 2003 KAR 1595
- Full Document
error in not making an order fixing the family pension of the petitioner and also to release the family pension ... November 16, 1995 and para 44 which repealed the Family Pension Scheme, 1971, (for short 'the scheme') and therefore, notwithstanding
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 4 - Cited by 0 -
(2000) IIILLJ 79 Kant
- M Chinnappa - Full Document
subscriber to the employees Provident Fund and Family Pension Fund. As such, she was entitled to get family pension ... applied to the second respondent for payment of family pension benefits. The second respondent by his letter dated March
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 1 - Cited by 0 -
ILR 1992 KAR 1792
- Full Document
PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO PAY THE FAMILY PENSION TO THE PETITIONER FORTHWITH WITH ARREARS FROM THE DATE ... seeking for a direction to third respondent to pay Family Pension to him forthwith with arrears from the date
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - A Kumar - Full Document
herein to refund the entire amount deducted from the family pension of the first respondent herein 3 with effect from ... amount paid in excess to her husband from the family pension of the applicant (first respondent herein). 2. Learned counsel
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - M A K.N.Phaneendra - Full Document
noticed that the appellants are entitled to family pension and the Tribunal had not taken that family pension amount into ... were heard on the question as to whether the family pension due to the petitioners should or should not have
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 5 - Cited by 0 -
2 (1993) ACC 536
- Venkataraman - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -