Mobile View
Filter Results by
Document Types
Courts
karnataka
1 - 10 of 689 (0.49 seconds)

Rule 31 of CPC. (B) KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SERVANTS (FAMILY PENSION) RULES, 1964--Who are entitled to the benefit under these ... rules? The Family Pension Scheme is in the nature of a Welfare scheme framed by the Government to provide relief
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - Padmaraj - Full Document
late Ramaswamy nominated the plaintiffs for purposes of his family pension and other benefits and despite all this, defendants ... finding given by the lower Court with reference to Family Pension allowable to the members of the family of deceased
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 19 - Cited by 0 -
II (1993) DMC 133
- N Bhat - Full Document
Government servant rendered service to compensate which a family pension scheme is devised, the widow and the dependent minors would ... equally entitled to the family pension as a matter of right. In fact, we look upon pension not merely
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 9 - Cited by 0 -
ILR 1997 KAR 302
- H Dattu - Full Document
Bench of this Court for consideration:- (1) Whether the family pension is liable to be deducted out of the compensation ... month. Due to his death, his wife is getting family pension of Rs. 440/- per month. The Tribunal held relying
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 20 - Cited by 4 -
I (1998) ACC 689
- R Raveendran - Full Document
claimant/appellant No. 1 was also getting the family pension of Rs. 600 per month and after the death ... amount of family pension which the claimant was awarded has to be deducted and on that basis, the Tribunal found
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 5 - Cited by 4 -
2001 ACJ 1340
- H N Tilhari - Full Document
subscriber to the employees Provident Fund and Family Pension Fund. As such, she was entitled to get family pension ... applied to the second respondent for payment of family pension benefits. The second respondent by his letter dated March
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 1 - Cited by 2 -
ILR 1992 KAR 1792
- Full Document
Karnataka High Court Sri Kumbaiah S/O Late ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 8
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - C J B.V.Nagarathna - Full Document
noticed that the appellants are entitled to family pension and the Tribunal had not taken that family pension amount into ... were heard on the question as to whether the family pension due to the petitioners should or should not have
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 5 - Cited by 1 -
1993 ACJ 850
- S Venkataraman - Full Document
noticed that the appellants are entitled to family pension and the Tribunal had not taken that family pension amount into ... were heard on the question as to whether the family pension due to the petitioners should or should not have
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 5 - Cited by 1 -
2 (1993) ACC 536
- Venkataraman - Full Document
justified in not taking into account the amount of family pension, provident fund and the gratuity, the collateral benefits received ... amounts received by the claimants in respect of Family Pension, provident Fund and Gratuity? 10. P. W. 3 Shylakumar
Karnataka High Court
- Cites 10 - Cited by 0 -
AIR 1981 Kant 129
- V Rao - Full Document
Get new documents for this query in your RSS feed reader -
1  
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next